ARTICLES

Response of Peanut Cultivars to Full and Reduced Spray Programs of Tebuconazole for Control of Southern Stem Rot¹

Authors: B. A. Besler , W. J. Grichar , O. D. Smith , A. J. Jaks

  • Response of Peanut Cultivars to Full and Reduced Spray Programs of Tebuconazole for Control of Southern Stem Rot¹

    ARTICLES

    Response of Peanut Cultivars to Full and Reduced Spray Programs of Tebuconazole for Control of Southern Stem Rot¹

    Authors: , , ,

Options

Abstract

Eleven commercially grown peanut cultivars were evaluated for disease and yield response to two and four applications of tebuconazole under moderate disease pressure (< 12 hits/12.2 m) by southern stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii). The incidence of southern stem rot was reduced in all cultivars when treated with two and four sprays of tebuconazole. Tamrun 96 and Southwest Runner had the lowest disease incidence. Cultivars responded with higher yields when sprayed with two and four applications of tebuconazole compared to the unsprayed plots. Peanut grade (SMK SS) was not affected by tebuconazole. Georgia Runner and Tamrun 96 produced the highest grade while Southwest Runner was the lowest.

Full Article Available as PDF only - Use Download Feature

Keywords: disease incidence, Sclerotium rolfsii.

How to Cite:

Besler, B. & Grichar, W. & Smith, O. & Jaks, A., (2001) “Response of Peanut Cultivars to Full and Reduced Spray Programs of Tebuconazole for Control of Southern Stem Rot¹”, Peanut Science 28(1), p.5-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.3146/i0095-3679-28-1-2

200 Views

79 Downloads

Published on
01 Jan 2001
Peer Reviewed
License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0

Author Notes

1Contribution from the Texas Agric. Exp. Sta., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TA No. 30526. Mention of a trade mark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable. This production was made possible through support provided by the Office of Agric., Bureau for Sci. and Tech., USAID, Grant No. DAN-4048-G-00-0041-00. Recommendations do not represent an official position or policy of USAID.