ARTICLES

Inheritance of Resistance to Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum in Six Virginia-type Peanut Lines1,3

Authors: Julia L. Kornegay , M. K. Beute , J. C. Wynne

  • Inheritance of Resistance to Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum in Six Virginia-type Peanut Lines1,3

    ARTICLES

    Inheritance of Resistance to Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum in Six Virginia-type Peanut Lines1,3

    Authors: , ,

Abstract

The inheritance of resistance to two cercospora leaf-spots, Cercospora arachidicola (early leafspot) and Cercosporidium personatum (late leafspot) in Virginia-type peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.), was determined using F1 and F2 generations and parental lines from a six parent diallel cross under natural field conditions. Two techniques for rating disease severity were employed. General combining ability, determined from both rating techniques, was significant for both F1 and F2 generations, indicating that resistance to both fungi and tolerance to infection i. e., minimal leaf defoliation, was primarily due to additive genetic effects.

The six parents produced offspring with different levels of resistance to both fungi. From the estimates of general combining ability effects, only NC-GP 343 and NC 5 produced progeny resistant to both early and late leaf-spot. NC 3033 was resistant to early leafspot, but susceptible to late leafspot. NC-Ac 3139, Florigiant and NC 2 were resistant to late leafspot, but susceptible to early leaf-spot. Disease indices ranked NC 3033 and NC-GP 343 as, overall, the most resistant of the six lines and the most useful to include in a cercospora leafspots resistance breeding program.

Available as PDF only - Use Download Feature

Keywords: Disease resistance, diallel cross, General Combining Ability, Arachis hypogaea, Groundnut

How to Cite:

Kornegay, J. & Beute, M. & Wynne, J., (1980) “Inheritance of Resistance to Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum in Six Virginia-type Peanut Lines1,3”, Peanut Science 7(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.3146/i0095-3679-7-1-2

189 Views

84 Downloads

Published on
31 Dec 1979

Author Notes

1Paper No. 6136 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, N. C.

3Use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the N. C. Agricultural Research Service of the products named, nor criticism of similar ones not mentioned.