Influence of Lactofen and 2,4-DB Combinations on Peanut Injury and Yield

Authors: J.A. Ferrell , R.G. Leon , B. Sellers , D. Rowland , B. Brecke

  • Influence of Lactofen and 2,4-DB Combinations on Peanut Injury and Yield


    Influence of Lactofen and 2,4-DB Combinations on Peanut Injury and Yield

    Authors: , , , ,


Lactofen plus crop oil adjuvants are increasingly being used to combat acetolactate synthase-resistant weeds in peanut production. To control a broader spectrum of weeds, it is desirable to mix 2,4-DB with lactofen. However, lactofen can be highly injurious to peanuts. It is unknown if the addition of 2,4-DB will exacerbate or prolong the injury observed by lactofen. Experiments were conducted in Citra and Jay, FL in 2011 and 2012 to examine the impact of lactofen, 2,4-DB and lactofen + 2,4-DB applied at 15, 30, and 45 days after planting (DAP) on peanut injury and yield. It was observed that 2,4-DB did not increase foliar injury or stunting (as measured by canopy width) compared to lactofen alone. Additionally, yield was not impacted by any herbicide combination or application timing. From these data, lactofen plus 2,4-DB combinations, applied with crop oil adjuvants, can be used with little concern for exacerbating effects on peanut growth or yield relative to lactofen applied alone.

Keywords: Peanut yield, canopy width, herbicide injury, herbicide combinations

How to Cite:

Ferrell, J. & Leon, R. & Sellers, B. & Rowland, D. & Brecke, B., (2013) “Influence of Lactofen and 2,4-DB Combinations on Peanut Injury and Yield”, Peanut Science 40(1), p.62-65. doi:



Published on
01 Jan 2013
Peer Reviewed


Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) continues to spread across the peanut production region of the southeast. Further complicating the spread of this weed is that many of these populations are resistant to acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibiting herbicides as well as other herbicides with alternative mechanisms of action (Heap, 2012; Wise et al., 2009). This is troublesome because imazapic is one of the few herbicides that has been shown to consistently provide effective control of Palmer amaranth (Grichar, 1997; 2007). Without imazapic, growers must rely on soil-applied herbicides, paraquat, and postemergence protoporphyrinogen-oxidase (PPO) inhibitors to control Palmer amaranth. While soil-applied herbicides can be effective in controlling Palmer amaranth, adequate rainfall or irrigation is required for activation, making control erratic and dependent on weather patterns (Dobrow et al., 2011). To avoid this complication, the only alternatives are postemergence PPO-inhibitors which are limited to acifluorfen or lactofen for control. Though these herbicides can be highly effective, Palmer amaranth size must be 10 cm in height, or less, for these herbicides to provide consistent control (Morichetti et al., 2012). Considering the rapid growth-rate, developing approaches to enhance herbicide performance are needed. Additionally, the application of lactofen to peanuts has shown mixed results. Boyer et al. (2011) reported that lactofen applied at 45 DAP did not result in yield loss while Dotray et al. (2012) did observe yield loss at 45 DAP. Therefore, relying on lactofen for Palmer amaranth control can potentially be a risky strategy.

In an attempt to manage Palmer amaranth that exceeds 10 cm in height, and possibly delay the development of PPO-resistance, 2,4-DB can be applied with lactofen. However, because lactofen is typically combined with crop oil adjuvants, this causes 2,4-DB to be applied with these products as well. While it has been shown that applications of 2,4-DB (at various schedules) in combination with crop oil does not significantly reduce peanut yield (Dotray et al., 2004), no research has investigated the combinations of 2,4-DB and crop oil with other herbicides.

In the plant, 2,4-DB is a non-active precursor molecule that must be converted into 2,4-D by a β-oxidation reaction (McComb and McComb, 1978). These reactions in legumes proceed slowly and high levels of active 2,4-D rarely occur (Wain and Wightman, 1954). However, lactofen plus crop oil adjuvants have been shown to cause as much as 48% injury and delay canopy closure by as much as 10 days (Boyer et al., 2011). Moreover, crop oil adjuvants have commonly been reported to increase herbicide uptake (Wanamarta and Penner, 1989). With the significant amount of peanut injury caused by lactofen, and the possible loading of more 2,4-DB into the plant, it is questioned if the inclusion of 2,4-DB with lactofen would intensify peanut injury or prolong recovery that would negatively impact yield.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if 2,4-DB plus lactofen combinations, applied with crop oil adjuvants, would adversely impact peanut yield. Secondly, it was questioned if these applications would delay peanut canopy development.

Materials and Methods

Experiments were conducted at the Plant Science Research and Education Unit in Citra, FL, as well as the West Florida Research and Education Center in Jay, FL. The soil type at Citra was an Arredondo fine sand (loamy, siliceous, semiactive, hyperthermic grossarenic paleudult) with 0.5% organic matter while the Jay location was an Orangeberg sandy loam (fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic typic kandiudults) with 1.5% organic matter. The cultivar Georgia-O6G (Branch, 2007) was planted between April 27 and May 17 at both locations in 2011 and 2012, respectively. These dates are all within the recommended planting window for their respective regions. The entire field was treated with pendimethalin (380 g/ha) and diclosulam (25 g/ha) prior to planting and hand-weeding was used when necessary to maintain the experiment weed-free. All fertility and pest management was provided in accordance to local management practices.

All experimental herbicide treatments were applied using a CO2-pressurized sprayer calibrated to deliver 187 L/ha. These included lactofen (200 g/ha), 2,4-dichlorophenoxy butric acid (2,4-DB) (275 g/ha) and lactofen (200 g/ha) + 2,4-DB (275 g/ha). All applications included a crop oil adjuvant at 1% v/v (Agridex; Helena Chemical Company. 225 Schilling Blvd., Suite 300. Collierville, TN 38017). These herbicide treatments were applied 15, 30, or 45 days after planting (DAP).

Visual estimates of percent peanut foliar burn were recorded 7, 14, and 21 days after treatment (DAT) using a scale of 0 to 100% where 0  =  no herbicide activity and 100  =  peanut death. Additionally, peanut canopy width was measured at 7 DAT at 5 random locations in each plot and averaged. Optimal crop maturity was determined by the hull scrape method (Williams and Drexler, 1981) and plots were harvested by inverting the center two rows of each plot using a conventional digger-shaker-inverter. Peanut was allowed to field dry for approximately 3 days and commercial harvesting equipment was used. Peanuts were dried to 9% moisture and yield was determined and adjusted to a kg/ha basis. Yield and peanut injury data were collected at the Citra location while only yield was collected at the Jay location. For ease of interpretation, canopy width and yield data where converted to percentage of the non-treated control.

The experimental design was a randomized complete block with a factorial arrangement of treatments with herbicide and timing as the two factors. Data were analyzed using ANOVA to detect the presence of main effects and interactions. Means were separated using Fisher's Protected LSD (P = 0.05).

Results and Discussion

The main effect of year, and all by year interactions, were not significant at either location. Therefore, data were combined across years. However, the herbicide by timing interaction was significant and all data are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.
Table 1.

Peanut response to lactofen and 2,4-DB applied with crop oil concentrate at 15, 30, or 45 days after planting in Citra, FL.

Peanut foliar injury ranged between 6 and 36% at 7 DAT (Table 1). As expected, lactofen and lactofen plus 2,4-DB combinations were most injurious ranging from 22 to 36% while injury from 2,4-DB alone was 6 to 7%. By 14 DAT, peanut recovered no treatment caused more than 9% injury. By 21 DAT, there was no observable peanut injury in any plots (data not shown). The level of injury from lactofen plus crop oil was expected. Boyer et al. (2011) observed lactofen and acifluorfen plus crop oil injured peanuts at levels ranging from 20 to 48%. Additionally, the overall low injury level of less than 10% from 2,4-DB was also expected. Numerous researchers have examined the injury potential of 2,4-DB and rarely have they reported any significant peanut injury (Grichar et al., 1997; Baughman et al., 2002; Dotray et al., 2004; Faircloth and Prostko, 2010). This indicates that 2,4-DB injury on peanut is commonly insignificant, even in the presence of crop oil adjuvants (Dotray et al., 2004), but the current question was to determine if the addition of 2,4-DB would increase or prolong the injury observed from lactofen alone. In these experiments, 2,4-DB did not increase injury over lactofen alone. At 7, 14, and 21 DAT, no significant differences were observed between lactofen and lactofen + 2,4-DB within an application timing (Table 1).

Peanut stunting, measured as canopy width 7 DAT, was also determined. There was evidence that both lactofen and lactofen plus 2,4-DB applied at 15 DAP resulted in some initial stunting effects, with 19 and 16% reduction in canopy width, respectively. Conversely, 2,4-DB applied alone resulted in only 3% reduction in canopy width and was not statistically different from the non-treated. This same trend was observed at the 30 DAP application timing with lactofen treatments resulting in 13% reduction in canopy width, while no reductions were observed with 2,4-DB alone. By 45 DAT, no reductions were noted for any application. The impact of lactofen on peanut canopy width was similar to that observed by Boyer et al., (2011) in that they reported that lactofen at 30 DAP resulted in greater canopy stunting when applied at 45 DAP. Regardless, the impact of herbicide application on peanut canopy width appears to be driven by lactofen and the addition of 2,4-DB does not impact this effect.

There were no yield reductions at either the Citra and Jay locations in either year for any herbicide or application timing (Table 1 and 2). Even with potential crop injury associated with lactofen application, other research has shown that applications of lactofen at 30 or 45 DAP was not detrimental to yield (Boyer et al., 2011). This is contrary to Dotray et al., (2012) where lactofen applied at 45 DAP did result in significant yield loss. The lack of impact on yield for 2,4-DB application rate and timing is also in agreement with previous results (Grichar et al., 1997; Baughman et al., 2002; Dotray et al., 2004). What is unique about the current research is the examination of the impact on yield by the combination of lactofen with 2,4-DB at different timings. The lack of yield loss with this herbicide combination indicates that this strategy can be effectively used for Palmer amaranth control without detrimental impacts on peanut production.

Table 2.
Table 2.

Peanut yield response to lactofen and 2,4-DB applied with crop oil concentrate at 15, 30, or 45 days after planting in Jay, FL.

Postemergence applications of lactofen are required for many peanut producers to control ALS-resistant Palmer amaranth. Since lactofen has been previously shown to cause significant foliar burn and peanut stunting when applied with crop oil, it was questioned if the addition of 2,4-DB would increase this injury. These results suggest that lactofen plus 2,4-DB combinations did not increase peanut injury over lactofen alone. Additionally, applications made between 15 and 45 DAP did not compromise yield. Therefore, peanut producers should have little concern about peanut safety if lactofen plus 2,4-DB (applied with crop oil adjuvants) combinations are required to address specific weed problems.

Literature Cited

Baughman T.A Grichar W.J and Jordan D.L 2002 Tolerance of Virginia-type peanut to different application timings of 2,4-DB Peanut Sci. 29 : 126 – 128 .

Branch W.D 2007 Registration of ‘Georgia-06G’ peanut J. Plant Reg. 1 : 120 .

Boyer J.A Ferrell J MacDonald G Tillman B and Rowland D 2011 Effect of acifluorfen and lactofen application timing on peanut injury and yield Online, Crop Management doi:10.1094/CM-2011-0519-01-RS .

Dobrow M.H Ferrell J Faircloth W MacDonald G Brecke B and Erickson J 2011 Effect of cover crop management and preemergence herbicides on the control of ALS-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in peanut Peanut Sci. 38 : 73 – 77 .

Dotray P.A Grichar W.J Baughman T.A Prostko E.P Grey T.L and Gilbert L.V 2012 Peanut Sci. 39 : 9 – 14 .

Dotray P.A Porter B.L and Keeling J.W 2004 Peanut response to 2,4-DB plus crop oil at various application timings Texas J. Agric. Nat. Res. 17 : 40 – 45 .

Faircloth W.H and Prostko E.P 2010 Effect of imazapic and 2,4-DB on peanut yield, grade, and seed germination Peanut Sci. 37 : 78 – 82 .

Grichar W.J 1997 Control of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with postemergence herbicides Weed Technol. 11 : 739 – 743 .

Grichar W.J Sestak D.C and Belser B.A 1997 Effects of various timings of 2,4-DB on runner-type peanut development and yield Peanut Sci. 24 : 105 – 106 .

Grichar W.J 2007 Horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum), smellmelon (Cucumis melo), and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in peanut with postemergence herbicides Weed Technol. 21 : 688 – 691 .

Heap I 2012 The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds Online. Internet. November 19, 2012. Available .

McComb A.J and McComb J.A 1978 Differences between plant species in their ability to utilize substituted phenoxybutyric acids as a source of auxin for tissue culture growth Plant Sci. Lett. 11 : 227 – 232 .

Morichetti S Ferrell J MacDonald G Sellers B and Rowland D 2012 Weed management and peanut response from applications of saflufenacil Weed Technol. 26 : 261 – 266 .

Wain R.L and Wightman F 1954 The growth regulating activity of certain omega-substituted alkyl carboxylic acids in relation to their beta-oxidation within the plant Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Boil. Sci. 142 : 525 – 536 .

Wanamarta G and Penner D 1989 Foliar penetration of herbicides Rev. Weed Sci. 4 : 215 – 231 .

Williams E.J and Drexler J.S 1981 A non-destructive method for determining peanut pod maturity Peanut Sci. 8 : 134 – 141 .

Wise A.M Grey T Prostko E Vencill W and Webster T 2009 Establishing the geographical distribution and level of acetolactate synthase resistance of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions in Georgia Weed Technol. 23 : 214 – 220 .


    Author Affiliations

  1. Associate Professors, Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
  2. Assistant Professor and Emeritus Professor, West Florida Research and Education Center, Jay, FL 32565
  3. Associate Professor, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona, FL 33865
  4. * Corresponding Author: