<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v2.2 20060430//EN" "nlm-dtd2.2/archivearticle.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.2" xml:lang="EN">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">pnut</journal-id>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="allenpress-id">pnut</journal-id>
			<journal-title>Peanut Science</journal-title>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">0095-3679</issn>
			<issn pub-type="active">0095-3679</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>American Peanut Research and Education Society</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3146/i0095-3679-16-2-10</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Articles</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Effects of Cleaning Peanuts on Insect Damage, Insect Population Growth and Insecticide Efficacy<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1"><sup>1</sup></xref></article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
					<name name-style="western">
						<given-names>Frank H.</given-names><x xml:space="preserve"> </x>
						<surname>Arthuf</surname>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				
					<aff id="aff2">
					<label><sup>2</sup></label>U.S Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Stored-Product Insects Research and Development Laboratory, P.O. Box 22909, Savannah, GA 31403
				</aff>
			</contrib-group>
			<author-notes>
				<fn fn-type="fn" id="fn1">
					<p><sup>1</sup>This paper reports the results of research only. Mention of a pesticide or a proprietary produce does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement by the USDA.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
				<month>7</month>
				<year>1989</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>16</volume>
			<issue>2</issue>
			<fpage>100</fpage>
			<lpage>105</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>21</day>
					<month>10</month>
					<year>1989</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<copyright-statement>American Peanut Research and Education Society</copyright-statement>
				<copyright-year>1989</copyright-year>
				<copyright-holder>American Peanut Research and Education Society</copyright-holder>
			</permissions>
			<related-article related-article-type="pdf" xlink:href="i0095-3679-16-2-10.pdf" xlink:type="simple"></related-article>
			<abstract>
				<title>Abstract</title>
				<p>Farmers stock peanuts were either cleaned by removing foreign material and reducing loose-shell kernels (LSK) or left uncleaned before being treated with insecticides, stored, and artificially infested with several stored peanut insect pest species. The uncleaned peanuts contained only 2.8&percnt; foreign material. After 8 and 10 months the percentage of insect-damaged cracked pod kernels was 1.7 to 3.4 X greater in cleaned treated peanuts than in uncleaned treated peanuts, and there was a direct inverse relationship between the number of LSK and the percentage of damaged cracked pod kernels. After 8 and 10 months, the percentage of damaged cracked pod kernels in each class of peanuts, cleaned and uncleaned, was 1.6-5.7 X greater in peanuts treated with 52 ppm malathion than in peanuts treated with either 25 ppm chlorpyrifos-methyl or 25 ppm chlorpyrifos-methyl &plus; 4 ppm methoprene. A significant difference in insect populations between cleaned and uncleaned peanuts occurred in untreated peanuts after two months, when almond moth and Indianmeal moth populations were greater in uncleaned peanuts. Thus, even a small amount of foreign material may provide a hospitable habitat for insect population growth. There were no significant differences in either insect damage or insect populations between chlorpyrifos-methyl and chlorpyrifos-methyl &plus; methoprene.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group>
				<title>Key Words</title>
				<kwd>Storage</kwd><x xml:space="preserve">; </x><x xml:space="preserve">, </x>
				<kwd>loose-shell kernels</kwd><x xml:space="preserve">; </x><x xml:space="preserve">, </x>
				<kwd>LSK</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<page-count count="6"></page-count>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
</article>
