<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//Atypon//DTD Atypon Systems Archival NLM DTD Suite v2.2.0 20090301//EN" "nlm-dtd2.2/archivearticle.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.2" xml:lang="EN">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">pnut</journal-id>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="allenpress-id">pnut</journal-id>
			<journal-title>Peanut Science</journal-title>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">0095-3679</issn>
			<issn pub-type="active">0095-3679</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>American Peanut Research and Education Society</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3146/i0095-3679-10-2-7</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Articles</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Comparisons of On-Farm Peanut Drying Systems in the Southwest<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1"><sup>1</sup></xref></article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
					<name name-style="western">
						<given-names>P. D.</given-names><x xml:space="preserve"> </x>
						<surname>Bloome</surname>
					</name><x xml:space="preserve">, </x>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
					<name name-style="western">
						<given-names>D. D.</given-names><x xml:space="preserve"> </x>
						<surname>Kletke</surname>
					</name><x xml:space="preserve">, and </x>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
					<name name-style="western">
						<given-names>J. R.</given-names><x xml:space="preserve"> </x>
						<surname>Sholar</surname>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				
					<aff id="aff2">
					<label><sup>2</sup></label>Professor of Agricultural Engineering, Professor of Agricultural Economics and Extension-Agronomy Crops Specialist, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078
				</aff>
			</contrib-group>
			<author-notes>
				<fn fn-type="fn" id="fn1">
					<p><sup>1</sup>Manuscript No. J-4335 of the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
				<month>7</month>
				<year>1983</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>10</volume>
			<issue>2</issue>
			<fpage>69</fpage>
			<lpage>72</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>5</day>
					<month>9</month>
					<year>1983</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<copyright-statement>American Peanut Research and Education Society</copyright-statement>
				<copyright-year>1983</copyright-year>
				<copyright-holder>American Peanut Research and Education Society</copyright-holder>
			</permissions>
			<related-article related-article-type="pdf" xlink:href="i0095-3679-10-2-7.pdf" xlink:type="simple"></related-article>
			<abstract>
				<title>Abstract</title>
				<p>The economic and management characteristics of five types of on-farm peanut drying systems were compared. Costs were determined as average present value costs per tonne using a 15-year planning horizon. The systems compared and their average present values of net, after tax, cash outflows were: high capacity, heated air drying - &dollar;16.50&sol;tonne; low temperature, controlled humidity drying - &dollar;23.07&sol;tonne; fan-powered, natural air drying - &dollar;20.88&sol;tonne; wind-powered, natural air drying in field modules - &dollar;22.15&sol;tonne; and sack drying in the field - &dollar;28.60&sol;tonne. Costs for the wind-powered, field module system were reduced to &dollar;18.00&sol;tonne by Federal Energy Tax Credits (15&percnt;) and further reduced to &dollar;9.70&sol;tonne by Oklahoma Energy Tax Credits (30&percnt;). Management comparisons included flexibility, drying capacity with respect to weather conditions, seed quality, risks of mold development and possibilities for multiple use.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group>
				<title>Key Words</title>
				<kwd>drying</kwd><x xml:space="preserve">; </x><x xml:space="preserve">, </x>
				<kwd>peanuts</kwd><x xml:space="preserve">; </x><x xml:space="preserve">, </x>
				<kwd>energy</kwd><x xml:space="preserve">; </x><x xml:space="preserve">, </x>
				<kwd>quality</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<page-count count="4"></page-count>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
</article>
