<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//Atypon//DTD Atypon Systems Archival NLM DTD Suite v2.2.0 20090301//EN" "nlm-dtd2.2/archivearticle.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.2" xml:lang="EN">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">pnut</journal-id>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="allenpress-id">pnut</journal-id>
			<journal-title>Peanut Science</journal-title>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">0095-3679</issn>
			<issn pub-type="active">0095-3679</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>American Peanut Research and Education Society</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3146/i0095-3679-10-2-6</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Articles</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>A Comparison of Methods of Evaluating Resistance to <italic>Cylindrocladium crotalariae</italic> in Peanut Field Tests<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1"><sup>1</sup></xref></article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
					<name name-style="western">
						<given-names>C. C.</given-names><x xml:space="preserve"> </x>
						<surname>Green</surname>
					</name><x xml:space="preserve">, </x>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
					<name name-style="western">
						<given-names>M. K.</given-names><x xml:space="preserve"> </x>
						<surname>Beute</surname>
					</name><x xml:space="preserve">, and </x>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
					<name name-style="western">
						<given-names>J. C.</given-names><x xml:space="preserve"> </x>
						<surname>Wynne</surname>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				
					<aff id="aff2">
					<label><sup>2</sup></label>Graduate Research Assistant of Crop Science, Professor of Plant Pathology and Associate Professor of Crop Science, respectively, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27650
				</aff>
			</contrib-group>
			<author-notes>
				<fn fn-type="fn" id="fn1">
					<p><sup>1</sup>Paper No. 8822 of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, NC 27650.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
				<month>7</month>
				<year>1983</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>10</volume>
			<issue>2</issue>
			<fpage>66</fpage>
			<lpage>69</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>3</day>
					<month>8</month>
					<year>1983</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<copyright-statement>American Peanut Research and Education Society</copyright-statement>
				<copyright-year>1983</copyright-year>
				<copyright-holder>American Peanut Research and Education Society</copyright-holder>
			</permissions>
			<related-article related-article-type="pdf" xlink:href="i0095-3679-10-2-6.pdf" xlink:type="simple"></related-article>
			<abstract>
				<title>Abstract</title>
				<p>Three methods presently used to evaluate disease resistance in peanut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.) to Cylindrocladium black rot (CBR) were compared to identify the most efficient method to screen peanut lines in field tests. Forty randomly selected F<sub>2</sub> families in the F<sub>5</sub> generation from a cross of the CBR-resistant source NC 3033 with NC 6 and the two parents were evaluated for percent dead and diseased plants, root rot index and microsclerotia&sol;g of root. Significant differences were detected between the parents (p = 0.05) and among segregates (familes) (p = 0.01) for percent dead and diseased plants only. Error components exceeded the mean square values for differences among segregates for the root rot index and microsclerotia&sol;g of root resulting in no significant differences among entries for these traits and low to no correlations among traits. Percent dead and diseased plants was concluded to be the best of the three methods for screening peanut lines in the field for CBR resistance.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group>
				<title>Key Words</title>
				<kwd><italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L</kwd><x xml:space="preserve">; </x><x xml:space="preserve">, </x>
				<kwd>Cylindrocladium black rot</kwd><x xml:space="preserve">; </x><x xml:space="preserve">, </x>
				<kwd>percent dead and diseased plants</kwd><x xml:space="preserve">; </x><x xml:space="preserve">, </x>
				<kwd>root rot index</kwd><x xml:space="preserve">; </x><x xml:space="preserve">, </x>
				<kwd>microsclerotia&sol;g of root</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<page-count count="4"></page-count>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
</article>
