Experiments were conducted in two different locations at the Virginia Tech Tidewater Agricultural Research & Extension Center (TAREC) in Suffolk in 2022 and 2023. In 2022, the soil type for Location 1 was 40% Eunola loamy fine sand and 60% Suffolk loamy sand, while Location 2 was 97% Suffolk loamy sand and 3% Nansemond fine sandy loam. In 2023, Location 1 was 90% Eunola loamy fine sand and 10% Suffolk loamy sand, and Location 2 was 95% Nansemond fine sandy loam and 5% Dragston fine sandy loam. Locations 1 and 2 in 2022 planted with peanut were rotated previously with sorghum and cotton, and barley, cotton, and corn, respectively. In 2023, both locations followed a three-year rotation cycle of cotton, corn, and peanuts. Locations were within a maximum radius of 4 km from each other.

Five commercial Virginia-type peanut cultivars were selected for this test (Bailey II, Sullivan, Walton, Emery, and N.C. 20). The peanut planting window in Virginia is between early and mid-May (Balota et al., 2023). In 2022, peanuts were planted on May 11 in Location 1 and on May 5 in Location 2. In 2023, planting occurred later, with peanuts planted on May 22 in Location 1 and May 23 in Location 2. For both years planting density was 17 seeds per meter. The experiment employed a randomized split-plot design with four replications. Spray programs served as the main plot treatments, with cultivars being subplots. Subplots were two 11 m long at 91.44 cm spacing with a 2 m alley between replicates. Two untreated border rows were placed between fungicide treatment main plots and 2.38-m bare-ground borders were used on plot ends. The high input program (HIP) included a tank mix of pydiflumetofen with the premix of azoxystrobin + benzovindiflupyr at 60 days after planting (DAP), a tank mix of pydiflumetofen, with the premix azoxystrobin + benzovindiflupyr, and the premix of prothioconazole + tebuconazole at 90 DAP, the premix of prothioconazole + tebuconazole at 105 DAP, and chlorothalonil at 120 DAP. The standard leaf spot program (SLSP) included chlorothalonil at 60 DAP and rotated with the premix of prothioconazole + tebuconazole every 14 days, which was designed to treat only leaf spot. There was a total of three chlorothalonil applications and one of the premix of prothioconazole + tebuconazole in 2022, and two chlorothalonil applications and one of the premix of prothioconazole + tebuconazole in 2023. The advisory program (AP) called for application of chlorothalonil at 60 DAP rotated with prothioconazole + tebuconazole according to the Virginia Peanut Leaf Spot Advisory’s Last Effective Spray Date, with additional fluazinam applications made according to the Virginia Peanut Sclerotinia Advisory (https://webipm.ento.vt.edu/cgi-bin/infonet1.cgi) (Table S1). All other inputs followed standard Virginia Cooperative Extension recommendations (Balota et al., 2023).

LLS was evaluated bi-weekly using the Florida scale (1-10), where 1 indicates no disease and 10 indicates complete defoliation and death (Chiteka et al., 1988) and percentage of defoliation was calculated as previously reported (Jordan et al., 2017, Li et al., 2012).

Sclerotinia blight (SB) incidence was recorded as infection foci exhibiting symptoms and/or signs of SB in increments of 30.5 cm of row length for each treatment row per plot. Both LLS and SB were quantified using the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC), where Yi = percent defoliation at the i^th observation, and Xi = time (days) at the i^th observation as described by Shaner and Finney (1977).

In 2022, Location 1 and Location 2 were dug on October 24 and October 21 and harvested on November 11 and November 4, respectively. In 2023, Location 1 and Location 2 were dug on October 6 and harvested on October 25. Peanuts were dug and harvested using a KMC two-row digger and a Hobbs peanut combine (Model 325A). Peanut pod yield by weight was determined using a 7% (w/w) moisture content conversion.

To calculate the net return of each fungicide program, the following formula was used:

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to evaluate the effects of spray programs (plots) and peanut cultivars (subplots), as well as their interaction, and AUDPC. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure (PROC MIXED) in SAS (version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A linear mixed-effects model was fitted with treatment, variety, and their interaction as fixed effects, and block and block x spray program as a random effect. Residuals from the initial model were examined for normality using the PROC UNIVARIATE procedure and inspecting the histograms. If the residuals did not meet the assumption of normality, the data were subjected to a square-root transformation. Least square means were back-transformed and used for graphical presentation. Model parameters were estimated using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method, and denominator degrees of freedom were computed using the Kenward–Roger approximation. Least square means (LSMEANS) were compared using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) adjustment to control for multiple comparisons. Significance was assessed at α = 0.05.

The development of cultivars with improved disease resistance have the potential to reduce reliance on fungicide applications (Woodward et al., 2008), subsequently lowering application costs. However, complete resistance to LLS and SB in peanuts is not yet available, resulting in variable disease responses each season among cultivars. Disease analysis for 2022 revealed no significant main effect of cultivars in Location 1 (p=0.39), and no interactions of cultivars and application programs were observed (p=0.40). However, there was a notable effect of fungicide programs, with all treatments displaying significant control of LLS compared to untreated plots (Figure 1). In Location 2, an interaction between cultivar and fungicide program was observed (p< 0.0001). When combined with fungicide programs, all cultivars exhibited significantly lower LLS disease pressure compared to untreated Bailey II, Sullivan, and Emery. Among the untreated plots, Bailey II demonstrated the greatest AUDPC of all, which conflicts with data from previous research (Jordan et al., 2025).

In 2023, significant interactions between fungicide programs and cultivars were observed at both Location 1 (p = 0.0087) and Location 2 (p = 0.003) (Figure 2). All fungicide programs demonstrated significant control of LLS across all cultivars at both locations. Among the untreated plots, Emery, Walton, and N.C. 20 exhibited lower AUDPC than Bailey II, while Sullivan did not differ statistically from any of the cultivars in Location 1. In Location 2, N.C. 20 and Walton exhibited lower AUDPC values than Emery, whereas Sullivan did not differ from other cultivars. Bailey II was only different from Walton. This variable disease response observed across both years and locations may be attributed to the resistance to LLS being linked to quantitative trait loci located on two distinct chromosomes and their associated gene networks ( Chu et al., 2019, Dang et al., 2021). A similar cultivar response pattern was also reported in Runner-type peanuts (Kaur et al., 2024), suggesting that peanut cultivar performance is influenced by environmental factors affecting disease pressure.

Although weather conditions in both 2022 and 2023 did not appear to be ideal for SB development, SB was present in Location 1 in 2023 (Figure 3). No significant interaction between spray programs and cultivars was observed for SB (p=0.23), and there was no main effect of cultivars (p=0.22). However, there was a main effect of spray program (p <0.0001). All spray programs effectively reduced SB compared to untreated plots. Although both AP and HIP showed numerically and significantly lower levels of SB compared to SLSP, respectively, the SLSP treatment still provided measurable SB suppression, despite not including a fungicide specifically targeting SB. The premix of prothioconazole and tebuconazole, rotated with chlorothalonil, has been a long-established and highly effective treatment for controlling LLS in peanut crops (Culbreath et al., 2008); however, there is some evidence that the premix of prothioconazole and tebuconazole (Batista da Silva and Langston, 2024) and timing (Woodward et al., 2015) of application may contribute to SB control.

Recently, combinations including pydiflumetofen and the premix of azoxystrobin and benzovindiflupyr have emerged as a viable alternative to fluazinam offering control for both LLS and SB simultaneously (Batista da Silva and Langston, 2024). This newer spray program can reduce overall fungicide application costs because it does not require additional sprays of fluazinam to manage SB. However, the onset of SB is driven by weather conditions, and applying fungicides on a fixed schedule as was used in the HIP may lead to unnecessary fungicide inputs in years where unfavorable weather conditions lead to low disease pressure.

There was no main effect of cultivar on yield in either 2022 (Location 1: p = 0.24; Location 2: p = 0.66) or 2023 (Location 1: p = 0.08; Location 2: p = 0.12). Additionally, the interaction between fungicide program and cultivar did not affect yield in 2022 (Location 1: p = 0.58; Location 2: p = 0.38) or 2023 (Location 1: p = 0.48; Location 2: p = 0.60). Fungicide programs did have a significant effect on yield in both years (Table 1). In 2022, Location 1 showed a greater yield response with HIP, yielding ca. 500 kg/ha greater than the untreated. However, the SLSP performed better at Location 2, producing yields 927 and 761 kg/ha higher than the untreated and HIP, respectively. The AP did not differ significantly from any of the spray programs at either location.

In 2023, the AP treatment improved yield compared to the untreated control and the HIP program in Location 1. Specifically, the AP yielded 7642 kg/ha, whereas the untreated and HIP plots produced 1413 and 1440 kg/ha less, respectively, despite the HIP providing significant suppression of both diseases relative to the untreated control. Conversely, in Location 2, the HIP program outperformed by ca. 1200 and 1300 kg/ha the untreated and AP treatment, respectively. The SLSP treatment yielded 6001 kg/ha, which did not differ statistically from any other spray program or the untreated check. The premix of azoxystrobin and benzovindiflupyr, tank-mixed with pydiflumetofen applied at 60 DAP and 90 DAP has proven to be an effective fungicide treatment for the simultaneous control of LLS and SB, resulting in yield improvement (Batista da Silva and Langston, 2024). However, because the application schedule differed slightly among locations, the yield response was not consistent across all sites, highlighting the importance of maintaining a well-timed fungicide program to achieve consistent disease suppression and maximize yield benefits.

Although untreated cultivars differed in disease control, none of the cultivars showed statistically significant differences in yield. Therefore, only fungicide cost was included in the calculations.

The average peanut prices from local buyers for Virginia-type peanuts in 2022 and 2023 were $0.55/kg and $0.57/kg ($0.25 and $0.26/lb), respectively. The estimated costs for each fungicide program quoted by three local retailers were $186.60/ha (2022) and $224.2/ha (2023) for the AP, $124.60/ha for the SLSP, and $324/ha for the HIP (Table 2). The AP is used to time fungicide sprays as needed based on weather-based diseases advisories provided on the Peanut-Cotton Infonet website. In 2023, environmental conditions were consistently favorable for disease which triggered more sprays using the AP resulting in increased fungicide costs.

In 2022, the AP provided a net return of 0.86% in Location 1 and 0.73% in Location 2. The SLSP provided a 0.07% net loss in Location 1 and a net return of 10.00% in Location 2. The HIP resulted in 1.90% negative net returns in Location 1 and 6.24% in Location 2. In 2023, the AP resulted in a positive return of 16.37% in Location 1 and a loss of 8.93% in Location 2. The SLSP yielded profits of 11.60% in Location 1 and 3.65% in Location 2. The HIP showed a negative net return of 9.60% in Location 1 compared to a positive net gain of 11.70% in Location 2.

In 2023, SB was observed only in Location 1, which limited the ability to fully and accurately assess net returns with fungicide with both diseases combined. Notably, the AP resulted in numerically lower yield compared to the untreated plots in Location 2, leading to negative returns for growers at that location. Nevertheless, the AP offers the potential to reduce the number of sprays during the season, thereby lowering production costs and potentially increasing profitability.

Although yield responses varied among years and locations, it remains unclear under which conditions the HIP would provide a greater economic benefit. Under moderate disease pressure, the HIP did not result in a positive net return for either disease. Moreover, the cost of the HIP ($323.95) was substantially greater than the other fungicide programs, regardless of the number of applications per season, making it an economically unfavorable option. Similar findings were reported by Kaur et al. (2024), who observed no significant differences in yield between high- and low-input programs, indicating that higher fungicide expenditures may not be justified. Among the spray programs evaluated, the SLSP generally provided a higher positive economic return than the other programs, except in Location 1 in 2022, indicating its potential as the most effective strategy. However, this program is solely designed for leaf spot management and may not be cost-effective in fields with high SB pressure. Further studies are needed to better understand the role of SLSP in the control of SB.

In conclusion, net returns vary annually based on disease pressure and weather conditions. Additional factors, including labor cost and pod grade, also influence overall net return and may fluctuate from year to year. Further research is needed to evaluate the full impact of fungicide applications on yield under high disease pressure and its impact on growers’ net returns.