<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">0095-3679</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Peanut Science</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">0095-3679</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>American Peanut Research and Education Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3146/PS20-13.1</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Resistance to fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) feeding identified in nascent allotetraploids cross-compatible to cultivated peanut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.)</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Levinson</surname>
<given-names>C.M.</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marasigan</surname>
<given-names>K.M.</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stalker</surname>
<given-names>H.T.</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Holbrook</surname>
<given-names>C.C.</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname>
<given-names>W.P.</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Ozias-Akins</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<email>pozias@uga.edu</email>
<xref ref-type="fn" rid="n1">1</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub" iso-8601-date="2020-11-01">
<month>11</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>7</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>47</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>123</fpage>
<lpage>134</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement />
<copyright-year>2009</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="i0095-3679-47-3-123.pdf" />
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>Fall armyworm (FAW) is an economically devastating, invasive pest in Sub-Saharan Africa and can be a major pest in the Americas. This pest feeds on more than 80 plant species, including peanut, and threatens the food security of millions of people who rely on these crops in Sub-Saharan Africa. An integrated pest management strategy, including resistant crop cultivars, is needed to control FAW, since populations have been reported to develop insecticide resistance. Genetic sources of host resistance to FAW are limited in cultivated peanut; however, strong resistance to FAW was reported previously in peanut wild relatives. In this <italic>in vitro</italic> study, we tested diploid peanut relatives including <italic>A. ipaensis</italic> KG37006 (<italic>Ipa</italic>), <italic>A. duranensis</italic> 30060 (<italic>Dur</italic>), <italic>A. correntina</italic> 9530 (<italic>Cor</italic>9530), and <italic>A. correntina</italic> 9548 (<italic>Cor</italic>9548); allotetraploids including <italic>IpaCor</italic>9530<sup>4x</sup>, <italic>IpaDur</italic><sup>4x</sup>; F<sub>2</sub> hybrids [<italic>A. hypogaea</italic> 13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>9530<sup>4x</sup>]; and cultivated peanut lines <italic>A. hypogaea</italic> &#8216;13-1014&#8217; and &#8216;Georgia Green&#8217; for FAW resistance to identify valuable materials in our breeding program. FAW development was measured by survival, larval weight, larval stage duration, pupation, pupal stage duration, moth emergence relative to pupation, and moth sex. All allotetraploids showed promise as donors for FAW resistance. This FAW resistance was derived primarily from <italic>A. ipaensis</italic>, but <italic>A. duranensis</italic> was also identified as a source of resistance, though more moderate. A high level of heterogeneity was found in <italic>A. correntina</italic> 9530, which likely contributed to the variable performance of this species in the bioassay. Producing hybrids and allotetraploids with wild <italic>Arachis</italic> species does not guarantee that each derived line from these crosses will be resistant, and since these lines are segregating, selection for resistance is still needed.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Antibiosis</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Arachis</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>host plant resistance</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>in vitro</italic>
</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Fall armyworm (FAW), <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a major defoliating pest in the Americas and has recently become an economically devastating, invasive pest in Sub-Saharan Africa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Sparks1">Sparks, 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Goergen1">Goergen <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>), as well as in Asia. FAW feeds on more than 80 economically important crops, including peanut. A thirteen billion dollar loss to FAW infestation was reported for maize, sorghum, rice, and sugarcane in Africa from 2016 to 2017 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Abrahams1">Abrahams <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>). Without control, FAW is a major defoliator that can cause high yield reductions, seriously affecting production in developing countries with limited access to pesticides and safety equipment to apply them properly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Cock1">Cock <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Day1">Day <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Bateman1">Bateman <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-CABI1">CABI, 2020</xref>). Producing FAW resistant cultivars will reduce reliance on pesticides, increase food security, and promote sustainable agriculture in these at-risk countries. In addition, resistant cultivars are needed to mitigate the insecticide resistance reported in FAW populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Yu1">Yu, 1991</xref>).</p>
<p>Genetic sources with strong FAW resistance are limited in cultivated peanut due to its narrow genetic base (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Stalker3">Stalker <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>). Peanut is an allotetraploid species (AABB; 2<italic>n</italic>=4<italic>x</italic>=40), and evidence suggests that it arose from a natural polyploidization event involving hybridization of the diploid species <italic>A. ipaensis</italic> (BB; 2<italic>n</italic>=2<italic>x</italic>=20) and <italic>A. duranensis</italic> (AA; 2<italic>n</italic>=2<italic>x</italic>=20) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Bertioli1">Bertioli <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>). The difference in ploidy levels between cultivated peanut and its wild relatives results in crossing barriers and constricts genetic diversity in peanut. Moderate levels of host resistance to FAW have been found in a few peanut cultivars such as &#8216;Southeastern Runner 56-15&#8242; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Hammons1">Hammons 1970</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Leuck1">Leuck and Skinner 1971</xref>), &#8216;Florunner&#8217; and &#8216;Tifton 8&#8242; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Todd1">Todd <italic>et al</italic>., 1991</xref>). On the other hand, more than 80 wild peanut relatives have diverse levels of resistance against a wide range of peanut insect pests and diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Stalker3">Stalker <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Stalker1">Stalker, 2017</xref>). Wild peanut relatives, such as <italic>Arachis cardenasii</italic>, already have proved to be useful sources of resistance to multiple pests including late leaf spot, early leaf spot, root-knot nematode, Cylindrocladium black rot, and Sclerotinia blight (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Simpson1">Simpson and Starr, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Stalker2">Stalker and Mozingo, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Gowda1">Gowda <italic>et al</italic>., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Simpson2">Simpson <italic>et al</italic>., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Tallury1">Tallury <italic>et al</italic>., 2014</xref>). Previous studies have identified wild peanut relatives such as <italic>A. cardenasii</italic>, <italic>A. correntina</italic>, and <italic>A. villosa</italic> as potential donors of strong FAW antibiosis and antixenosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Painter1">Painter, 1951</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Kogan1">Kogan and Ortman, 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Lynch1">Lynch <italic>et al</italic>., 1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Ortega1">Ortega <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>). These <italic>Arachis</italic> species displayed antibiosis through high FAW mortality rates and inhibition of FAW development and displayed antixenosis due to FAW non-preference to feed on these materials (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Lynch1">Lynch <italic>et al</italic>., 1981</xref>). In addition, <italic>A. ipaensis</italic> showed antibiosis through a high FAW mortality rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Yang1">Yang <italic>et al</italic>., 1993</xref>). However, further work has not resulted in FAW resistance being introgressed from these wild relative species into a cultivated background useful for peanut breeders. This study identified FAW resistance in newly created allotetraploids that are cross compatible to cultivated, allotetraploid peanut. Resistant allotetraploid lines identified in this study can be used in breeding programs in the United States and shared with breeding programs in East and West Africa to introgress FAW resistance into elite cultivars. The long-term goal of this study is to create FAW resistant peanut cultivars that can protect yields in the United States and increase yields in regions with limited access to pesticides in Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="s2a">
<title>Plant Materials</title>
<p>Wild <italic>Arachis</italic> species, <italic>A. ipaensis</italic> Krapov. and W.C. Gregory (PI 468322, GKBSPSc 30076; abbrev.: <italic>Ipa</italic>)<italic>, A. duranensis</italic> Krapov. and W.C. Gregory (PI 468197, GKBSPSc 30060; abbrev.: <italic>Dur</italic>), <italic>A. correntina</italic> (Burkart) Krapov. and W.C. Gregory (PI 262808, GKP 9530; abbrev.: <italic>Cor</italic>9530) and (PI 262881, GKP 9548; abbrev.: <italic>Cor</italic>9548) were grown and the diploid hybrids generated in 2016 at North Carolina State University (NCSU). <italic>IpaDur<sup>4x</sup></italic> and <italic>IpaCor</italic>9530<sup>4</sup><italic><sup>x</sup></italic> allotetraploids were created from the diploid hybrids by colchicine treatment of F<sub>1</sub> hybrid cuttings at the University of Georgia (UGA) Tifton Campus. The susceptible <italic>A. hypogaea</italic> controls included &#8216;Georgia Green&#8217; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Branch1">Branch, 1996</xref>) and <italic>&#8216;</italic>13-1014,&#8217; a breeding line selected from [(C1805-617-2 x &#8216;Florida-07&#8242; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Gorbet1">Gorbet and Tillman, 2009</xref>)) x &#8216;Georgia-06G&#8217; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Branch2">Branch, 2007</xref>)]. C1805-617-2 is a selection from &#8216;Tifguard&#8217; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Holbrook1">Holbrook <italic>et al</italic>., 2008</xref>) x &#8216;Florida-07&#8242;.</p>
<p>Due to limitations of labor and pesticide-free plants required for bioassay, the resistance evaluation was performed in three experiments with <italic>Ipa</italic> and allotetraploids with <italic>Ipa</italic> as one parent being tested in all of the experiments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t01">Table 1</xref>). The first experiment, aimed to test the level of resistance in <italic>IpaDur<sup>4x</sup>,</italic> was conducted in July 2018 and included seven genotypes as treatments: <italic>Ipa</italic>, <italic>Dur</italic>, Georgia Green, and four S<sub>2</sub> generation <italic>IpaDur<sup>4x</sup></italic> plants. The allotetraploids were each designated an arbitrary number to make distinguishing them easier (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t01">Table 1</xref>). <italic>IpaDur</italic>_1 and <italic>IpaDur</italic>_2 originated from the same <italic>IpaDur</italic>_S<sub>0:1</sub> plant, while <italic>IpaDur</italic>_3 and <italic>IpaDur</italic>_ 4 originated from the same <italic>IpaDur</italic>_S<sub>0:5</sub> plant. The second experiment was designed to test the level of resistance in <italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic>; it was carried out in May 2019 and included 10 genotypes as treatments: <italic>Ipa</italic>, <italic>Cor</italic>9530, <italic>Cor</italic>9548, <italic>A. hypogaea</italic> 13-1014, three S<sub>1</sub> generation <italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic> plants, and three F<sub>1</sub> plants made from a cross between <italic>A. hypogaea</italic> 13-1014 and three different S<sub>0</sub><italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic> plants (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t01">Table 1</xref>). <italic>Cor</italic> (PI 261870) was previously reported to have FAW resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Lynch1">Lynch <italic>et al</italic>., 1981</xref>), but was not included in this study due to lack of seed supply. The third experiment was conducted in November 2019 to directly compare the level of resistance detected in materials from the first two experiments. The third experiment included eight genotypes as treatments: <italic>Ipa</italic>, <italic>Dur</italic>, <italic>Cor</italic>9530, Georgia Green, <italic>A. hypogaea</italic> 13-1014, one <italic>IpaDur<sup>4x</sup></italic> S<sub>2</sub> plant, and two <italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic> S<sub>1</sub> plants (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t01">Table 1</xref>). <italic>IpaDur</italic>_5 was an S<sub>2</sub> plant that originated from one of the <italic>IpaDur<sup>4x</sup></italic> lines tested in the July 2018 experiment. <italic>IpaCor</italic>_4 originated from <italic>IpaCor</italic>_1 tested in the May 2019 experiment, while <italic>IpaCor</italic>_5 originated from <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2. In this last experiment, four genotypes were terminated early because the plants grew slowly in the short day length season and failed to produce enough leaves to complete the test. The earliest date of termination was 17 DAI (days after infestation) for genotype <italic>Dur</italic>.</p>
<table-wrap id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t01" position="float">
<label>Table 1.</label>
<caption>
<p>Genetic materials tested in each fall armyworm feeding bioassay and their abbreviations and ploidy level</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t01.png" />
<!-- <table frame="hsides" rules="none">
<colgroup>
<col id="tb1col1" align="left" charoff="0" char=""/>
<col id="tb1col2" align="left" charoff="0" char=""/>
<col id="tb1col3" align="left" charoff="0" char=""/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<td align="left"><hr/>July 2018 Bioassay: Plant Materials</td>
<td><hr/>Abbreviation</td>
<td><hr/>Ploidy Level</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Georgia Green</td>
<td><bold>Georgia Green</bold><sup>a</sup></td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>A. ipaensis</italic> 30076</td>
<td><italic><bold>Ipa</bold></italic></td>
<td>Diploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>A. duranensis</italic> 30060</td>
<td><italic><bold>Dur</bold></italic></td>
<td>Diploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>IpaDur</italic>30060<sup>4x</sup>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:1</sub>&#x0005F;S<sub>1:2</sub></td>
<td><italic>IpaDur</italic>&#x0005F;1</td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>IpaDur</italic>30060<sup>4x</sup>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:1</sub>&#x0005F;S<sub>1:4</sub></td>
<td><italic>IpaDur</italic>&#x0005F;2</td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>IpaDur</italic>30060<sup>4x</sup>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:5</sub>&#x0005F;S<sub>1:2</sub></td>
<td><italic>IpaDur</italic>&#x0005F;3</td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>IpaDur</italic>30060<sup>4x</sup>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:5</sub>&#x0005F;S<sub>1:4</sub></td>
<td><italic>IpaDur</italic>&#x0005F;4</td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><hr/>May 2019 Bioassay: Plant Materials</td>
<td><hr/>Abbreviation</td>
<td><hr/>Ploidy Level</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>A. hypogaea</italic> 13-1014</td>
<td><bold>13-1014</bold></td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>A. ipaensis</italic> 30076</td>
<td><italic><bold>Ipa</bold></italic></td>
<td>Diploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>A. correntina</italic> 9530</td>
<td><italic><bold>Cor</bold></italic><bold>9530</bold></td>
<td>Diploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>A. correntina</italic> 9548</td>
<td><italic>Cor</italic>9548</td>
<td>Diploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:2</sub>&#x0005F;S<sub>1</sub></td>
<td><italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;1</td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:5</sub>&#x0005F;S<sub>1</sub></td>
<td><italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;2</td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:6</sub>&#x0005F;S<sub>1</sub></td>
<td><italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;3</td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>9530<sup>4x</sup>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:2</sub>)&#x0005F;F<sub>1:4</sub>&#x0005F;F<sub>2</sub></td>
<td>(13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;1)&#x0005F;F<sub>2</sub></td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>9530<sup>4x</sup>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:5</sub>)&#x0005F;F<sub>1:4</sub>&#x0005F;F<sub>2</sub></td>
<td>(13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;2)&#x0005F;F<sub>2</sub></td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(13-2113 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>9530<sup>4x</sup>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:6</sub>)&#x0005F;F<sub>1:4</sub>&#x0005F;F<sub>2</sub></td>
<td>(13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;3)&#x0005F;F<sub>2</sub></td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><hr/>November 2019 Bioassay: Plant Materials</td>
<td><hr/>Abbreviation</td>
<td><hr/>Ploidy Level</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Georgia Green</td>
<td><bold>Georgia Green</bold></td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>A. hypogaea</italic> 13-1014</td>
<td><bold>13-1014</bold></td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>A. ipaensis</italic> 30076</td>
<td><italic><bold>Ipa</bold></italic></td>
<td>Diploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>A. duranensis</italic> 30060</td>
<td><italic><bold>Dur</bold></italic></td>
<td>Diploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>A. correntina</italic> 9530</td>
<td><italic><bold>Cor9530</bold></italic></td>
<td>Diploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>IpaDur</italic>30060<sup>4x</sup>&#x0005F;S<sub>2:1</sub></td>
<td><italic>IpaDur</italic>&#x0005F;5<sup>b</sup></td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>IpaCor</italic>9530<sup>4x</sup>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:2</sub>&#x0005F;S<sub>1:9</sub></td>
<td><italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;4 <sup>c</sup></td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><italic>IpaCor</italic>9530<sup>4x</sup>&#x0005F;S<sub>0:5</sub>&#x0005F;S<sub>1:7</sub></td>
<td><italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;5 <sup>c</sup></td>
<td>Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="nt101">
<label><sup>a</sup></label>
<p>Bolded genotypes were tested in more than one experiment</p>
</fn>
<fn id="nt102">
<label><sup>b</sup></label>
<p><italic>IpaDur</italic>&#x0005F;5 originated from one of the <italic>IpaDur</italic> lines tested in the July 2018 experiment</p>
</fn>
<fn id="nt103">
<label><sup>c</sup></label>
<p><italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;4 originated from <italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;1 and <italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;5 originated from <italic>IpaCor</italic>&#x0005F;2</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot> -->
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2b">
<title>Fall Armyworm Resistance Evaluation</title>
<p>For each of the three experiments, seeds were coated in Vitavax PC (Vitavax, Crompton, Middlebury, CT) and treated overnight in 0.5% Florel Growth Regulator (Lawn and Garden Products Inc., Fresno, CA) to break dormancy. Seeds were then planted in #123 7.62 cm round x 11.43 cm deep Jiffy Pots (Harris Seeds, Rochester, NY) and transplanted approximately one month later into 121.92 cm round x 27.94 cm deep pots filled with Promix growth medium (Premier Tech Horticulture, Quakertown, PA). Normal plant management was applied in the greenhouse except that insecticide treatments were withheld.</p>
<p>When plants were three months old, FAW eggs (corn strain) were obtained from USDA-ARS Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS. Thirty replications were tested for each genotype, in which one replication comprised one FAW larva fed on the excised leaflets from a genotype. Within 24 h of egg hatch, the neonate larvae were gently transferred with a soft tip paintbrush from the bag of FAW egg masses onto a fresh, newly emerged leaflet placed in a 100 mm x 15 mm Petri dish (ThermoFisher Scientific). Each Petri dish contained a sheet of 9 cm diameter Whatman No. 1 filter paper (ThermoFisher Scientific) supported by a cotton round (Equate Beauty) that was saturated with approximately 4 ml of deionized water. The day that the neonate larvae were transferred onto the leaflets was considered day 0 after infestation (0 DAI). Petri dishes were sealed with Parafilm® M laboratory film (Bemis Company, Inc.) for the first week to prevent the FAW from escaping. For the next three days, Petri dishes with dead FAW larva were replenished with another neonate larva. On the day a Petri dish was restarted with a new FAW larva, that day was considered 0 DAI for that particular plate. The Petri dishes were examined daily to relocate FAW larvae that may have moved off of the leaflets and onto or underneath the filter paper. Daily inspection ensured that FAW larvae would have the opportunity to feed on plant material, and that the filter paper and cotton pad could be moistened if they had become dry. Fresh leaflets were offered every other day for one week, then fresh leaves were offered daily to meet the need of increased larval feeding. The moistened cotton pad and filter paper were changed as the frass from FAW larva accumulated and contaminated the filter paper.</p>
<p>The following parameters were evaluated to study the effect of plant genotype on FAW growth and development: survival, larval weight, larval stage duration, pupation, pupal stage duration, moth emergence relative to pupation, and moth sex. Low survival, larval weight, pupation, and emergence as well as high larval stage duration and pupal stage duration indicated deceleration of normal FAW growth and development. Sex ratio was an indicator of genotype effect on FAW fitness in which a deviation from a 1:1 (male to female) indicated a genotypic effect of the host plants on FAW sexual dimorphism. Sex ratio was included, since diet and other environmental effects have been found to negatively affect adult insect, including FAW, sex ratios (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Bull1">Bull, 1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Murua1">Murúa and Virla, 2004</xref>). Biased sex ratio could be utilized as one of the valuable tactics for sustained pest management in multiple cropping systems. FAW survival was documented daily. Larval weight was recorded at 14 DAI. Larval stage duration documented the number of days from first-instar larva stage to pupal formation. Pupation and relative moth emergence described completed pupation and moth emergence relative to the number of pupa formed, respectively. Pupal stage duration denoted the number of days recorded from pupal development to moth emergence. Pupal weight was recorded on the day of complete pupal formation. Moth sex (male or female) was determined after emergence.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2c">
<title>Genotyping the diploid species</title>
<p>
<italic>Cor</italic> demonstrated morphological diversity; therefore, we genotyped the diploid species using the Affymetrix Axiom_Arachis2 SNP array (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Clevenger1">Clevenger <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Korani1">Korani <italic>et al</italic>. 2019</xref>) consisting of 47,000 features (ThermoFisher Scientific). DNA was extracted by the Qiagen DNeasy Plant mini kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). SNP calling was performed with Axiom Analysis Suite (Version 1.2). Genetic markers were grouped into six categories by the software depending on the quality and separation of markers 1) Monomorphic 2) PolyHighResolution 3) NoMinorHom 4) OfftargetVariant 5) CallRateBelowThreshold 6) Other. Only the 5,342 markers in the PolyHighResolution class were used for analysis since the grouping of samples was unambiguous and all the samples passed quality control.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2d">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using JMP software (SAS Institute) to determine the genotype effect on FAW growth and development according to the following parameters: larval weight, larval stage duration, pupal stage duration, and pupal weight. Chi-squared tests were performed with JMP software to determine the genotype effect on the following categorical parameters used to assess FAW development: survival at 8 DAI and 14 DAI (dead or alive), pupation (pupated or did not pupate), relative moth emergence (emerged or did not emerge), and moth sex (male or female). For relative moth emergence, data (emerged or did not emerge) was only included for FAW that pupated. Means of each parameter among the treatments were separated based on the Tukey&#8217;s Test (α = 0.05) results with JMP software. Tukey&#8217;s Test for binomial data was not supported with JMP software, so RStudio (RStudio, Inc.) was used by running genotype effect on survival at 8 DAI and 14 DAI, pupation and relative moth emergence as a generalized linear model and then Tukey&#8217;s Test (α = 0.05) was performed on the model results. Genotypes with less than four replications for a measurement were excluded from statistical analysis. Therefore, larval stage duration, pupation, pupal weight, pupal stage duration, relative moth emergence, and moth analysis only included eight genotypes for the May 2019 experiment with <italic>Ipa</italic> and <italic>IpaCor</italic>_3 excluded and only four genotypes for the November 2019 experiments with <italic>Cor</italic>, <italic>Dur</italic>, <italic>Ipa</italic>, and <italic>IpaDur</italic>_5 excluded due to being terminated before pupal formation. The data for both the May and November 2019 experiments were still valid, since they were maintained according to experimental design and the controls were continued.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3a">
<title>Survival</title>
<p>Significant genotypic effect on FAW survival at 8 DAI and 14 DAI was found for the May 2019 experiment and the November 2019 experiment, but not for the July 2018 experiment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t02">Table 2</xref>). However, Tukey-Kramer significant differences between genotypes were not found for neither 8 DAI nor 14 DAI for all three experiments (Table S1). In all three experiments, the cultivated control genotypes had the highest FAW survival (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>). For the July 2018 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>A), the allotetraploid <italic>IpaDur</italic>_2 had the greatest FAW mortality. Only 30% (9 of the 30) of FAW fed exclusively on <italic>IpaDur</italic>_2 survived to the end of the experiment and completed their life cycle. The larval survival curves on <italic>Ipa</italic> and <italic>Dur</italic> were below that of the susceptible cultivated peanut control.</p>
<table-wrap id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t02" position="float">
<label>Table 2.</label>
<caption>
<p>ANOVA and chi-squared test output testing the genotype effect on FAW growth and development according to the following parameters: survival at 8 DAI and 14 DAI, larval weight, larval stage duration, pupation, pupal stage duration, pupal weight, relative moth emergence, and moth sex.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t02.png" />
<!-- <table frame="hsides" rules="none">
<colgroup>
<col id="tb2col1" align="left" charoff="0" char=""/>
<col id="tb2col2" align="char" charoff="0" char="."/>
<col id="tb2col3" align="left" charoff="0" char=""/>
<col id="tb2col4" align="char" charoff="0" char="."/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<td align="left"><hr/>Parameter</td>
<td><hr/><italic>F</italic> or <italic>X</italic><sup>2</sup> value</td>
<td><hr/>df(n) <sup>a</sup>, df(d) <sup>b</sup></td>
<td><hr/>P-value</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Survival at 8DAI (July 2018)</td>
<td>8.66</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Survival at 8DAI (May 2019)</td>
<td>92.62</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Survival at 8DAI (Nov. 2019)</td>
<td>26.44</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0.0004&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Survival at 14DAI (July 2018)</td>
<td>11.81</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Survival at 14DAI (May 2019)</td>
<td>117.61</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Survival at 14DAI (Nov. 2019)</td>
<td>35.41</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Larval weight (July 2018)</td>
<td>11.14</td>
<td>6, 156</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Larval weight (May 2019)</td>
<td>23.60</td>
<td>9, 151</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Larval weight (Nov. 2019)</td>
<td>29.92</td>
<td>7, 205</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Larval stage duration (July 2018)</td>
<td>12.13</td>
<td>6, 131</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Larval stage duration (May 2019)</td>
<td>29.60</td>
<td>7, 124</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Larval stage duration (Nov. 2019)</td>
<td>38.01</td>
<td>3, 92</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pupation (July 2018)</td>
<td>20.94</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0.0019&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pupation (May 2019)</td>
<td>82.15</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pupation (Nov. 2019)</td>
<td>38.24</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pupal Weight (July 2018)</td>
<td>22.68</td>
<td>6, 131</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pupal Weight (May 2019)</td>
<td>14.91</td>
<td>7, 124</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pupal Weight (Nov. 2019)</td>
<td>84.12</td>
<td>3, 92</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pupal stage duration (July 2018)</td>
<td>2.66</td>
<td>6, 117</td>
<td>.019&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pupal stage duration (May 2019)</td>
<td>8.92</td>
<td>7, 113</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.0001&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pupal stage duration (November 2019)</td>
<td>1.32</td>
<td>3, 79</td>
<td>0.27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Relative moth emergence (July 2018)</td>
<td>11.45</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0.077</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Relative moth emergence (May 2019)</td>
<td>6.14</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0.052</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Relative moth emergence (Nov. 2019)</td>
<td>10.66</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>&#x0003C; 0.014&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Moth sex (July 2018)</td>
<td>7.32</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0.29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Moth sex (May 2019)</td>
<td>11.92</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Moth sex (Nov. 2019)</td>
<td>4.29</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>0.23</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="nt201">
<label><sup>a</sup></label>
<p>The df(n), degrees of freedom of the numerator, is based on the number of plant genotypes tested</p>
</fn>
<fn id="nt202">
<label><sup>b</sup></label>
<p>The df(d), degrees of freedom of the denominator, is based on the total number of replicates, in which a replicate is one plate with one FAW, for all plant genotypes tested</p>
</fn>
<fn id="nt203">
<label><sup>c</sup></label>
<p>&#x0002A;P &#x0003C; .05. &#x0002A;&#x0002A;P &#x0003C; .01. &#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;P &#x0003C; .001</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot> -->
</table-wrap>
<fig id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01" position="float">
<label>Fig. 1.</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>Survival of FAW throughout the life cycle during the experimental period. (A) July 2018 Experiment. (B) May 2019 Experiment. (C) November 2019 Experiment.</bold></p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01.png" />
</fig>
<p>Unlike the other two experiments, the May 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>B) had a high mortality of FAW larvae just four days after the onset of the experiment. This is likely due to a trained entomologist performing the July 2018 and November 2019 experiments. However, all allotetraploids had survival curves below the susceptible control. Both accessions of <italic>A. correntina</italic> were similar to the susceptible control, although <italic>Cor</italic>9530 lost five more FAW larvae (17% more) than <italic>Cor</italic>9548.</p>
<p>In the November 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>C), <italic>Ipa</italic>, <italic>Dur</italic>, <italic>Cor</italic>, and <italic>IpaDur</italic>_5 had to be terminated early due to insufficient plant material to sustain the FAW feeding. However, FAW larvae fed on susceptible controls showed almost identical survival curves as the previous two experiments. The FAW larva survival curve on <italic>Cor</italic>9530 closely followed survival curves of the susceptible controls. <italic>IpaCor</italic>_4, a progeny line from <italic>IpaCor</italic>_1 that showed high FAW mortality in the May 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>B), also had a survival curve similar to the controls. <italic>Ipa</italic> and <italic>Dur</italic> had similar survival curves to the July 2018 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>C) until the treatments were terminated. <italic>IpaCor</italic>_5 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>C), a progeny line from <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>B) that had high FAW mortality in the May 2019 experiment, had the greatest FAW mortality in the November 2019 experiment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3b">
<title>Larval Weight</title>
<p>Genotype had a significant effect on larval weight in all of the experiments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t02">Table 2</xref>). All five <italic>IpaDur<sup>4x</sup></italic> allotetraploid plants significantly reduced FAW larval weight compared to the cultivated peanut genotypes included as experimental controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Fig. 2</xref>). For the July 2018 experiment, the allotetraploid <italic>IpaDur</italic>_2 that had the greatest FAW mortality also had the numerically lowest larval weight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Figs. 1</xref>A, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">2</xref>A). As for <italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic>, three out of five tested allotetraploid plants (<italic>IpaCor</italic>_1, <italic>IpaCor</italic>_4, and <italic>IpaCor</italic>_5) significantly suppressed larval weight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Figs. 2</xref>B, C). The other two <italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic> plants (<italic>IpaCor</italic>_2 and <italic>IpaCor</italic>_3) also reduced larval weight, yet the level of reduction did not show statistical significance when compared to the cultivated peanut controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Fig. 2</xref>B). This is partly due to high mortality of FAW larvae in the May 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>B), which led to small sample size, and affected statistical power for larval weight data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Fig. 2</xref>B). For example, while the larval weight on <italic>IpaCor</italic>_1 was 35% of the control and found to be significantly different, the <italic>Ipa</italic> larval weight was only 13.5% of the control but not significantly different due to the small sample size caused by mortality of FAW larvae on <italic>Ipa</italic> leaves. When the two allotetraploid lines were tested side-by-side in the November 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Fig. 2</xref>C), <italic>IpaDur</italic>_5 demonstrated a stronger level of FAW resistance by reducing FAW larval weight to a greater extent than <italic>IpaCor9530</italic>_4 and <italic>IpaCo</italic>r9530_5.</p>
<fig id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02" position="float">
<label>Fig. 2.</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>Larva weight on day 14 after feeding on different peanut leaflets. (A) July 2018 Experiment. (B) May 2019 Experiment. (C) November 2019 Experiment. Error bars represent standard error. Tukey&#8217;s HSD significance levels were calculated within each experiment, so these significance groupings cannot be compared between the three experiments. Genotypes within an experiment with the same Tukey&#8217;s HSD letter are not significantly different (α = 0.05).</bold></p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02.png" />
</fig>
<p>Diploid parents of both allotetraploid lines were included in this study to determine the source of FAW resistance. Compared to the cultivated peanut control, <italic>Ipa</italic> significantly suppressed FAW weight gain in the July 2018 and November 2019 experiments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Figs. 2</xref>A, C). <italic>Dur</italic> also significantly reduced the weight of FAW larvae but to a numerically lesser extent than that of <italic>Ipa</italic> in the November 2019 experiment. Conflicting results were found between the May 2019 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Fig. 2</xref>B) and November 2019 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Fig. 2</xref>C) experiments for <italic>Cor</italic>9530. A significant, positive effect on larval weight was observed in the May 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Fig. 2</xref>B) and a significant suppressive effect was found in the November 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Fig. 2</xref>C). <italic>Cor</italic>9548 was tested only in one experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Fig. 2</xref>B) and it was found to increase larval weight gain. A high level of genetic heterogeneity was found in <italic>Cor</italic>9530 (Table S2). Among the three genotyped <italic>Cor</italic>9530 plants, 1,259 out of 5,342 total markers (23.5%) were found to be polymorphic. On the contrary, only 23 (0.4%) and 27 (0.5%) polymorphic markers were found with <italic>Ipa</italic> and <italic>Dur</italic>, respectively. Therefore, the conflicting feeding response on <italic>Cor</italic>9530 could be due to the genetic diversity within this accession. In the May 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f02">Fig. 2</xref>B), three 13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic> F<sub>2</sub> plants were found to be segregating for larval weight. The (13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>_1)_F<sub>2</sub> plant demonstrated a significantly greater increase in larval weight compared to the cultivated control. The (13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2)_F<sub>2</sub> plant also showed a similar effect on larval weight compared to the cultivated control. The (13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>_3)_F<sub>2</sub> plant demonstrated high suppression of FAW growth similar to the <italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3c">
<title>Larval Stage Duration</title>
<p>Genotype had a significant effect on larval stage duration in all of the experiments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t02">Table 2</xref>). In all three experiments, the cultivated controls had the shortest larval stage duration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f03">Fig. 3</xref>). Compared to the cultivated control, <italic>Ipa</italic> significantly reduced larval growth and development by extending larval stage duration in the July 2018 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f03">Fig. 3</xref>A). Likewise, all allotetraploids significantly extended larval stage duration, except for <italic>IpaDur</italic>_1 in the July 2018 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f03">Fig. 3</xref>A). <italic>IpaCor</italic>_5, the allotetraploid with the greatest FAW mortality in the November 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>B), significantly outperformed <italic>IpaCor</italic>_4 by greatly extending larval stage duration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f04">Fig. 4</xref>B). While <italic>Ipa</italic> significantly extended larval stage duration, <italic>Dur, Cor</italic>9530, and <italic>Cor</italic>9548 did not differ significantly from the cultivated controls.</p>
<fig id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f03" position="float">
<label>Fig. 3.</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>Larval stage duration. (A) July 2018 Experiment. (B) May 2019 Experiment. (C) November 2019 Experiment. Error bars represent standard error. Tukey&#8217;s HSD significance levels were calculated within each experiment, so these significance groupings cannot be compared between the three experiments. Genotypes within an experiment with the same Tukey&#8217;s HSD letter are not significantly different (α = 0.05).</bold></p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f03.png" />
</fig>
<fig id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f04" position="float">
<label>Fig. 4.</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>Pupation. (A) July 2018 Experiment. (B) May 2019 Experiment. (C) November 2019 Experiment.</bold></p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f04.png" />
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3d">
<title>Pupation</title>
<p>Genotype had a significant effect on pupation in all of the experiments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t02">Table 2</xref>). For the July 2018 and May 2019 experiments, Tukey-Kramer significant differences between genotypes were not found; however, 13-1014 had significantly more pupated FAW than <italic>IpaCor_</italic>5 (Table S1). Across all the experiments, the cultivated controls had the highest number of FAW to pupate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f04">Fig. 4</xref>). For the July 2018 experiment, <italic>IpaDur</italic>_2, which had the highest FAW mortality (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>A), also had the fewest FAW to pupate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f04">Fig. 4</xref>A). For the May 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f04">Fig. 4</xref>B), pupation was heavily influenced by FAW mortality early in the experiment. Despite this artifact, all allotetraploids had a lower number of FAW to pupate than the cultivated control. Both <italic>Cor</italic>9530 and <italic>Cor</italic>9548 had a similar number of FAW to pupate as compared to the cultivated control. Line (13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>_1)_F<sub>2</sub> also had a similar number of FAW to pupate as compared to the cultivated controls, while (13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2)_F<sub>2</sub> and (13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>_3)_F<sub>2</sub> had much lower numbers of FAW to pupate as compared to the cultivated controls. For the November 2019 experiment, <italic>IpaCor_</italic>4 had a similar number of FAW to pupate as the cultivated controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f04">Fig. 4</xref>C), while <italic>IpaCor</italic>_5 had significantly less pupa form as compared to 13-1014 (Table S1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3e">
<title>Pupal Weight</title>
<p>Genotype had a significant effect on average pupal weight across all experiments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t02">Table 2</xref>). All allotetraploids, except <italic>IpaCor</italic>_1 in the May 2019 experiment, had significantly lower pupal weight than the cultivated controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f05">Fig. 5</xref>). <italic>IpaDur</italic>_3 and <italic>IpaDur</italic>_4 had significantly lower pupal weight than <italic>IpaDur</italic>_1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f05">Figs. 5</xref>A, C). <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2 had the lowest pupal weight of all the allotetraploids in the May 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f05">Fig. 5</xref>B). <italic>IpaCor</italic>_5, the progeny line of <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2, had the lowest pupal weight in the November 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f05">Fig. 5</xref>C). <italic>Ipa</italic>, <italic>Dur</italic>, and <italic>Cor</italic>9548 all had significantly lower pupal weight than the respective cultivated control. However, <italic>Cor</italic>9530 was not statistically different from the cultivated control in the May 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f05">Fig. 5</xref>B).</p>
<fig id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f05" position="float">
<label>Fig. 5.</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>Pupal weight. (A) July 2018 Experiment. (B) May 2019 Experiment. (C) November 2019 Experiment. Error bars represent standard error. Tukey&#8217;s HSD significance levels were calculated within each experiment, so these significance groupings cannot be compared between the three experiments. Genotypes within an experiment with the same Tukey&#8217;s HSD letter are not significantly different (α = 0.05).</bold></p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f05.png" />
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3f">
<title>Pupal Stage Duration</title>
<p>Genotype had a significant effect on pupal stage duration in the July 2018 experiment and the May 2019 experiment, but not in the November 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t02">Table 2</xref>). Across all three experiments, <italic>Ipa</italic>, <italic>Dur</italic>, <italic>Cor</italic>9530, and <italic>Cor</italic>9548 were not significantly different from the cultivated controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f06">Fig. 6</xref>). However, <italic>IpaCor</italic>_1 and (13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2)_F<sub>2</sub> had significantly longer pupal stage duration than the cultivated control, indicating these materials impeded pupal stage development (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f06">Fig. 6</xref>B).</p>
<fig id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f06" position="float">
<label>Fig. 6.</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>Pupal stage duration. (A) July 2018 Experiment. (B) May 2019 Experiment. (C) November 2019 Experiment. Error bars represent standard error. Tukey&#8217;s HSD significance levels were calculated within each experiment, so these significance groupings cannot be compared between the three experiments. Genotypes within an experiment with the same Tukey&#8217;s HSD letter are not significantly different (α = 0.05).</bold></p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f06.png" />
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3g">
<title>Relative Moth Emergence</title>
<p>Genotype had a significant effect on relative moth emergence in the November 2019 experiment but not the July 2018 or May 2019 experiments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t02">Table 2</xref>), and Tukey-Kramer significant differences between genotypes for relative moth emergence were not found for any of the three experiments (Table S1). All of the allotetraploids, except for <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2 and <italic>IpaCor</italic>_4 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f07">Fig. 7</xref>B, C), supported less relative moth emergence than the cultivated controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f07">Fig. 7</xref>). Allotetraploids had a high number of aborted pupae with the highest being 38.5% (5 out of 13 pupa) for <italic>IpaCor</italic>_5, then 25% (5 out of 20 pupa) for <italic>IpaDur</italic>_4, and 18.9% (4 out of 22) for <italic>IpaDur</italic>_3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f07">Fig. 7</xref>A, C). In comparison, Georgia Green had 4.2% (1 out of 24) and 7.1% (2 out of 28) aborted pupa in the July 2018 and November 2019 experiments, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f07">Fig. 7</xref>A, C). <italic>Arachis hypogea</italic> 13-1014 had 7.1% (2 out of 28) and 6.9% (2 out of 29) aborted pupa in the July 2018 and November 2019 experiments, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f07">Fig. 7</xref>A, C). The overall low number of 8 moths formed on <italic>IpaCor</italic>_5, a progeny line of <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2, was due to early FAW mortality and high pupa abortion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Figs. 1</xref>B, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f07">7</xref>B). All larvae fed on <italic>Ipa</italic>, <italic>Dur</italic>, <italic>Cor</italic>9530, and <italic>Cor</italic>9548 showed similar relative moth emergence as compared to the cultivated controls. Also, larvae fed on <italic>Cor</italic>9530 showed similar relative moth emergence as compared to the larvae fed on <italic>Cor</italic>9548 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f07">Fig. 7</xref>B). Lastly, the (13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>)_F<sub>2</sub> plants all had similar relative moth emergence when compared to the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f07">Fig. 7</xref>B).</p>
<fig id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f07" position="float">
<label>Fig. 7.</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>Percent of moths formed based on pupa number. (A) July 2018 Experiment. (B) May 2019 Experiment. (C) November 2019 Experiment.</bold></p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f07.png" />
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3h">
<title>Moth Sex</title>
<p>Genotype did not have a significant effect on moth sex in the July 2018, May 2019, nor November 2019 experiment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-t02">Table 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The wild peanut-derived allotetraploid genotypes showed promise as sources for FAW resistance for peanut breeding programs, since all <italic>IpaDur</italic><sup>4x</sup> and <italic>IpaCor</italic>9530<sup>4x</sup> allotetraploids significantly reduced larval weight (except <italic>IpaCor_</italic>2 and <italic>IpaCor_</italic>3), increased pupal stage duration (except <italic>IpaDur</italic>_1), and decreased pupal weight (except <italic>IpaCor</italic>_1) as compared to the controls. All allotetraploid genotypes showed lower survival and pupation than the cultivated genotypes evaluated as well as lower relative moth emergence (except <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2 and <italic>IpaCor</italic>_4). The most promising allotetraploid line, <italic>IpaDur</italic>_2, had the lowest larval weight and the greatest FAW mortality in the July 2018 experiment. This was further supported by <italic>IpaDur</italic>_5, which significantly reduced larval and pupal weight in the November 2019 experiment. <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2 and its progeny <italic>IpaCor</italic>_5 were shown as a promising line as they both suppressed FAW growth in the May and November 2019 experiments. Since segregation for FAW resistance in the allotetraploids was found, further selections for FAW resistance in individual lines will be necessary for effective utilization of these materials in a breeding program.</p>
<p>Primarily <italic>Ipa</italic>, but also <italic>Dur</italic>, were shown to be donor sources for FAW resistance, by reducing larval and pupal weight, survival and pupation. The conclusion that <italic>Ipa</italic> is valuable as a source for FAW resistance confirms a previous report (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Yang1">Yang <italic>et al</italic>., 1993</xref>). However, a 79% mortality rate at 8 DAI was reported for <italic>A. ipaensis</italic> in a similar bioassay with five wild <italic>Arachis</italic> species and <italic>A. hypogaea</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Yang1">Yang <italic>et al</italic>., 1993</xref>). The bioassay did differ in the use of terminal buds from field-grown plants rather than expanded leaves from greenhouse-grown plants. Two of our three experiments showed generally higher survival for <italic>Ipa</italic> with 8 DAI mortality rates of 16.7%, 80%, and 20% for the July 2018, May 2019, and November 2019 experiments, respectively. The high mortality of FAW fed on <italic>Ipa</italic> leaves in the May 2019 experiment may be an artifact of this experiment having overall higher FAW mortality than the other two experiments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-f01">Fig. 1</xref>), influenced by a trained entomologist performing the July 2018 and November 2019 experiments. Overall, the mean <italic>Ipa</italic> mortality rate was 38.9% across the three experiments. However, the low larval weight of <italic>Ipa</italic> supports the previous conclusions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Yang1">Yang <italic>et al</italic>., 1993</xref>). Another FAW bioassay study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Lynch1">Lynch <italic>et al</italic>., 1981</xref>) tested 14 wild <italic>Arachis</italic> species, not including <italic>Ipa</italic> and <italic>Dur</italic>, and recommended <italic>Cor</italic> (PI 261870) as a source for FAW resistance. <italic>Cor</italic> (PI 261870) impeded FAW survival and development and also showed antixenosis in a free-choice preference test. We tested <italic>Cor</italic>9530 and <italic>Cor</italic>9548 instead of <italic>Cor</italic> (PI 261870), because <italic>Cor</italic> (PI 261870) seeds were not available. Unlike the previously reported results, conflicting results were found regarding the FAW resistance in <italic>Cor</italic>9530 plants tested in these experiments. Genotyping detected a high level of SNP variation within <italic>Cor9530,</italic> suggesting this diploid species accession is highly heterogeneous which may explain the contradictory bioassay results of FAW resistance within this species. In addition, <italic>IpaCor</italic>_1, <italic>IpaCor</italic>_2, and <italic>IpaCor</italic>_3 were derived from crosses between <italic>Ipa</italic> and different <italic>Cor9530</italic> individuals, so genetic difference between these lines can be ascribed to parental heterogeneity or genetic segregation in the allotetraploids.</p>
<p>This study builds upon previous reports by focusing on allotetraploids that are cross compatible to <italic>A. hypogaea</italic> and are therefore valuable to breeding programs, instead of focusing solely on diploid, wild <italic>Arachis</italic> species. In the May 2019 experiment, varied levels of FAW resistance were detected among the three tested F<sub>2</sub> lines from 13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic> cross. The (13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>_1)_F<sub>2</sub> plant had an even greater larval weight than <italic>A. hypogaea</italic> 13-1014, while the (13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>_3)_F<sub>2</sub> plant was similar to the allotetraploids, suggesting the FAW resistance from <italic>IpaCor9530<sup>4x</sup></italic> segregated in the F<sub>2</sub> populations. An expanded study of a population derived from the tested (13-1014 x <italic>IpaCor</italic>)_F<sub>2</sub> materials is needed to determine the inheritance pattern and conduct genetic mapping of FAW resistance QTL.</p>
<p>The major limitation of this study is that all three experiments were confined to <italic>in vitro</italic> bioassays using excised peanut leaflets. Due to the required labor for these bioassays that included daily examination of each plate for 44 days per experiment, only a limited number of genotypes could be tested. A progression to this study would be to confirm these results in a field trial and then to map FAW resistance QTL in a mapping population. However, it is difficult to maintain a peanut field with FAW infestation in the southeastern U.S. because of the abundance of natural insect enemies in the peanut fields throughout the growing season and the sporadic nature of FAW as a pest on peanut plants. However, a field study could be performed in collaboration with partners in Africa, where FAW is a newly invasive pest and FAW pressures are high.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>This study built upon previous reports by testing FAW resistance in the unique allotetraploids instead of just wild, diploid <italic>Arachis</italic> species alone. The allotetraploids examined in this study showed strong FAW resistance, making them more useful than peanut cultivars previously found to have only moderate levels of FAW resistance. Furthermore, these allotetraploids are cross-compatible with peanut cultivars, making this resistance accessible for peanut breeders. These FAW resistant allotetraploids will be shared with breeding programs in the United States and Africa so that FAW resistance can be introgressed into elite peanut cultivars to effectively reduce the impact of the FAW (as an invasive pest) on peanut production in countries where growers have limited access to pesticides. At the same time, FAW resistant peanut cultivars can protect yields in the United States, increase yields in regions with limited use of pesticides, decrease reliance on pesticides, and promote organic peanut production and sustainable agriculture in general.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant # MCB-1543922) and by the AFRI NIFA Fellowships Grant Program: Predoctoral Fellowships project accession no. 1019105 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. The authors would like to express their appreciation to Susan Wolf of USDA-ARS, Mississippi State, Mississippi, for providing the FAW eggs and their appreciation to Micah Levinson of the Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Georgia, for assisting in data collection.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>Literature Cited</title>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Abrahams1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abrahams,</surname>
<given-names>P.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beale,</surname>
<given-names>T.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cock,</surname>
<given-names>M.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Corniani,</surname>
<given-names>N.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Day,</surname>
<given-names>R.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Godwin,</surname>
<given-names>J.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murphy,</surname>
<given-names>S.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richards,</surname>
<given-names>G.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Bos.</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2017</year>.
<source><italic>Fall armyworm status, Impacts and control options in Africa: Preliminary evidence note</italic></source>.
<publisher-name>United Kingdom&#8217;s Department for International Development</publisher-name>.
Retrieved 21 Dec 2019, from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.cabi.org/isc/FullTextPDF/2018/20187200430.pdf">https://www.cabi.org/isc/FullTextPDF/2018/20187200430.pdf</ext-link> </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Bateman1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bateman,</surname>
<given-names>M.L.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Day,</surname>
<given-names>R.K.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luke,</surname>
<given-names>B.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edgington,</surname>
<given-names>S.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuhlmann,</surname>
<given-names>U.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Cock.</surname><given-names>M.J.W.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2018</year>.
<article-title>Assessment of potential biopesticide options for managing fall armyworm (<italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic>) in Africa</article-title>.
<source>J. Appl. Entomo</source>.
<volume>142</volume>:
<fpage>805</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>819</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Bertioli1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bertioli,</surname>
<given-names>D.J.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cannon,</surname>
<given-names>S.B.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Froenicke,</surname>
<given-names>L.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang,</surname>
<given-names>G.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farmer,</surname>
<given-names>A.D.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cannon,</surname>
<given-names>E.K.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu,</surname>
<given-names>X.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao,</surname>
<given-names>D.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clevenger,</surname>
<given-names>J.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dash,</surname>
<given-names>S.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren,</surname>
<given-names>L.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moretzsohn,</surname>
<given-names>M.C.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shirasawa,</surname>
<given-names>K.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang,</surname>
<given-names>W.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vidigal,</surname>
<given-names>B.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abernathy,</surname>
<given-names>B.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu,</surname>
<given-names>Y.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niederhuth,</surname>
<given-names>C.E.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Umale,</surname>
<given-names>P.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Araújo,</surname>
<given-names>A.C.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kozik,</surname>
<given-names>A.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DoKim,</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burow,</surname>
<given-names>M.D.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varshney,</surname>
<given-names>R.K.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang,</surname>
<given-names>X.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang,</surname>
<given-names>X.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barkley,</surname>
<given-names>N.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimarães,</surname>
<given-names>P.M.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Isobe,</surname>
<given-names>S.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo,</surname>
<given-names>B.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao,</surname>
<given-names>B.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stalker,</surname>
<given-names>H.T.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmitz,</surname>
<given-names>R.J.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scheffler,</surname>
<given-names>B.E.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leal-Bertioli,</surname>
<given-names>S.C.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xun,</surname>
<given-names>X.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jackson,</surname>
<given-names>S.A.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michelmore,</surname>
<given-names>R.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Ozias-Akins.</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2016</year>.
<article-title>The genome sequences of <italic>Arachis duranensis</italic> and <italic>Arachis ipaensis</italic>, the diploid ancestors of cultivated peanut</article-title>.
<source>Nat. Genet</source>.
<volume>48</volume>:
<fpage>438</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>446</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Branch1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Branch,</surname>
<given-names>W.D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<year>1996</year>.
<article-title>Registration of &#8217;Georgia Green&#8217; peanut</article-title>.
<source>Crop Sci</source>.
<volume>36</volume>:
<fpage>806</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Branch2">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Branch,</surname>
<given-names>W.D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<year>2007</year>.
<article-title>Registration of &#8217;Georgia-06G&#8217; peanut</article-title>.
<source>J. Plant Regist</source>.
<volume>1</volume>:
<fpage>120</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Bull1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bull,</surname>
<given-names>J.J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<year>1981</year>.
<article-title>Sex ratio evolution when fitness varies</article-title>.
<source>Heredity</source><volume>46</volume><issue>(1)</issue>:
<fpage>9</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>26</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-CABI1">
<mixed-citation>
<collab>CABI.</collab>
<year>2020</year>.
<article-title>Invasive Species Compendium: <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (fall armyworm)</article-title>.
Retrieved 21 Dec 2019, from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/29810">http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/29810</ext-link> </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Clevenger1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Clevenger,</surname>
<given-names>J.P.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Korani,</surname>
<given-names>W.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ozias-Akins,</surname>
<given-names>P.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Jackson.</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2018</year>.
<article-title>Haplotype-based genotyping in polyploids</article-title>.
<source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source><volume>9</volume>:
<fpage>564</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Cock1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cock,</surname>
<given-names>M.J.W.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beseh,</surname>
<given-names>P.K.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buddie,</surname>
<given-names>A.G.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cafá,</surname>
<given-names>G.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Crozier.</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2017</year>.
<article-title>Molecular methods to detect <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> in Ghana, and implications for monitoring the spread of invasive species in developing countries</article-title>.
<source>Sci. Rep</source>.
<volume>7</volume><issue>(1)</issue>:
<fpage>4103</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Day1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Day,</surname>
<given-names>R.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abrahams,</surname>
<given-names>P.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bateman,</surname>
<given-names>M.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beale,</surname>
<given-names>T.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clottey,</surname>
<given-names>V.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cock,</surname>
<given-names>M.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Colmenarez,</surname>
<given-names>Y.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Corniani,</surname>
<given-names>N.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Early,</surname>
<given-names>R.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Godwin,</surname>
<given-names>J.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomez,</surname>
<given-names>J.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moreno,</surname>
<given-names>P.G.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murphy,</surname>
<given-names>S.T.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oppong-Mensah,</surname>
<given-names>B.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phiri,</surname>
<given-names>N.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pratt,</surname>
<given-names>C.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silvestri,</surname>
<given-names>S.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Witt.</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2017</year>.
<article-title>Fall armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa</article-title>.
<source>Outlooks on Pest Management</source><volume>28</volume><issue>(5)</issue>:
<fpage>196</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>201</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Goergen1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goergen,</surname>
<given-names>G.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar,</surname>
<given-names>P.L.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sankung,</surname>
<given-names>S.B.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Togola,</surname>
<given-names>A.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Tamò.</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2016</year>.
<article-title>First report of outbreaks of the fall armyworm <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J E Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), a new alien invasive pest in West and Central Africa</article-title>.
<source>PLoS ONE</source><volume>11</volume><issue>(10)</issue>:
<fpage>e0165632</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Gorbet1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gorbet,</surname>
<given-names>D.W.</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Tillman.</surname><given-names>B.L.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2009</year>.
<article-title>Registration of &#8216;Florida-07&#8242; peanut</article-title>.
<source>J. Plant Regist</source>.
<volume>3</volume>:
<fpage>14</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>18</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Gowda1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gowda,</surname>
<given-names>M.V.C.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Motagi,</surname>
<given-names>B.N.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naidu,</surname>
<given-names>G.K.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diddimani,</surname>
<given-names>S.B.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Sheshagiri.</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2002</year>.
<article-title>GPBD 4: A Spanish bunch groundnut genotype resistant to rust and late leaf spot</article-title>.
<source>International <italic>Arachis</italic> Newsletter</source><volume>22</volume>:
<fpage>29</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>32</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Hammons1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hammons,</surname>
<given-names>R.O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<year>1970</year>.
<article-title>Registration of Southeastern Runner 56-15 peanuts</article-title>.
<source>Crop Sci</source>.
<volume>10</volume><issue>(6)</issue>:
<fpage>727</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Holbrook1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Holbrook,</surname>
<given-names>C.C.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Timper,</surname>
<given-names>P.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Culbreath,</surname>
<given-names>A.K.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Kvien.</surname><given-names>C.K.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2008</year>.
<article-title>Registration of &#8216;Tifguard&#8217; peanut</article-title>.
<source>J. Plant Regist</source>.
<volume>2</volume>:
<fpage>92</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>94</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Kogan1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kogan,</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Ortman.</surname><given-names>E.F.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1978</year>.
<article-title>Antixenosis: A new term proposed to define Painter&#8217;s nonpreference modality of resistance</article-title>.
<source>Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am</source>.
<volume>24</volume>:
<fpage>175</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>176</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Korani1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Korani,</surname>
<given-names>W.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clevenger,</surname>
<given-names>J.P.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu,</surname>
<given-names>Y.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Ozias-Akins.</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2019</year>.
<article-title>Machine learning as an effective method for identifying true single nucleotide polymorphisms in polyploid plants</article-title>.
<source>Plant Genome</source><volume>12</volume>:
<fpage>180023</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Leuck1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leuck,</surname>
<given-names>D.B.</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Skinner.</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1971</year>.
<article-title>Resistance in peanut foliage influencing fall armyworm control</article-title>.
<source>J. Econ. Entomol</source>.
<volume>64</volume>:
<fpage>148</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>150</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Lynch1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lynch,</surname>
<given-names>R.E.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Branch,</surname>
<given-names>W.D.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Garner.</surname><given-names>J.W.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1981</year>.
<article-title>Resistance of <italic>Arachis</italic> species to the fall armyworm, <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic></article-title>.
<source>Peanut Sci</source>.
<volume>8</volume>:
<fpage>106</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>109</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Murua1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Murúa,</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Virla.</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2004</year>.
<article-title>Population parameters of <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (Smith) (Lep.: Noctuidae) fed on corn and two predominant grasses in Tucuman (Argentina)</article-title>.
<source>Acta Zool. Mex</source>.
<volume>20</volume><issue>(1)</issue>:
<fpage>199</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>210</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Ortega1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ortega,</surname>
<given-names>M.A.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>All,</surname>
<given-names>J.N.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boerma,</surname>
<given-names>H.R.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Parrott.</surname><given-names>W.A.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2016</year>.
<article-title>Pyramids of QTLs enhance host&#8211;plant resistance and Bt-mediated resistance to leaf-chewing insects in soybean</article-title>.
<source>Theor. Appl. Genet</source>.
<volume>129</volume>:
<fpage>703</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>715</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Painter1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Painter,</surname>
<given-names>R.H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<year>1951</year>.
<article-title>Insect resistance in crop plants</article-title>.
<source>Soil Sci</source>.
<volume>72</volume>:
<fpage>481</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Simpson1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Simpson,</surname>
<given-names>C.E.</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Starr.</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2001</year>.
<article-title>Registration of &#8216;COAN&#8217; peanut</article-title>.
<source>Crop Sci</source>.
<volume>41</volume>:
<fpage>918</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Simpson2">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Simpson,</surname>
<given-names>C.E.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Starr,</surname>
<given-names>J.L.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Church,</surname>
<given-names>G.T.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burow,</surname>
<given-names>M.D.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Paterson.</surname><given-names>A.H.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2003</year>.
<article-title>Registration of &#8216;Nema TAM&#8217; peanut</article-title>.
<source>Crop Sci</source>.
<volume>33</volume>:
<fpage>1418</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Sparks1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sparks,</surname>
<given-names>A.N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<year>1986</year>.
<article-title>Fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Potential for area-wide management. Fla</article-title>.
<source>Entomol</source>.
<volume>69</volume><issue>(3)</issue>:
<fpage>603</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>614</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Stalker1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stalker,</surname>
<given-names>H.T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<year>2017</year>.
<article-title>Utilizing wild species for peanut improvement</article-title>.
<source>Crop Sci</source>.
<volume>57</volume>:
<fpage>1102</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>1120</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Stalker2">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stalker,</surname>
<given-names>H.T.</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Mozingo.</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2001</year>.
<article-title>Molecular markers of <italic>Arachis</italic> and marker-assisted selection</article-title>.
<source>Peanut Sci</source>.
<volume>28</volume>:
<fpage>117</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>123</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Stalker3">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stalker,</surname>
<given-names>H.T.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tallury,</surname>
<given-names>S.P.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seijo</surname>
<given-names>G.R.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Leal-Bertioli.</surname><given-names>S.C.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2016</year>.
<article-title>Biology, speciation, and utilization of peanut species</article-title>.
In: Stalker, H.T. and R.F. Wilson,(Eds.), <source>Peanuts: Genetics, Processing, and Utilization. Academic Press and AOCS Press, pp. 27-66.</source></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Tallury1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tallury,</surname>
<given-names>S.P.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Isleib,</surname>
<given-names>T.G.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Copeland,</surname>
<given-names>S.C.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosas-Anderson,</surname>
<given-names>P.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balota,</surname>
<given-names>M.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh,</surname>
<given-names>D.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Stalker.</surname><given-names>H.T.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2014</year>.
<article-title>Registration of two multiple disease-resistant peanut germplasm lines derived from <italic>Arachis cardenasii</italic> Krapov. &amp; Gregory, W.C. GKP 10017</article-title>.
<source>J. of Plant Regist</source>.
<volume>8</volume><issue>(1)</issue>:
<fpage>86</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>89</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Todd1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Todd,</surname>
<given-names>J.W.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beach,</surname>
<given-names>R.M.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Branch.</surname><given-names>W.D.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1991</year>.
<article-title>Resistance in eight peanut genotypes to foliar feeding of fall armyworm, velvetbean caterpillar and corn earworm</article-title>.
<source>Peanut Sci</source>.
<volume>18</volume>:
<fpage>38</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>40</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Yang1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang,</surname>
<given-names>G.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Espelie,</surname>
<given-names>K.E.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Todd,</surname>
<given-names>J.W.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Culbreath,</surname>
<given-names>A.K.,</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pittman,</surname>
<given-names>R.N.,</given-names>
</name> and
<name><surname>Demski.</surname><given-names>J.W.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1993</year>.
<article-title>Cuticular lipids from wild and cultivated peanuts and the relative resistance of these peanut species to fall armyworm and thrips</article-title>.
<source>J. Agric. and Food Chem</source>.
<volume>41</volume>:
<fpage>814</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>818</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="i0095-3679-47-3-123-Yu1">
<mixed-citation>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu,</surname>
<given-names>S.J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<year>1991</year>.
<article-title>Insecticide resistance in the fall armyworm, <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J. E. Smith)</article-title>.
<source>Pestic. Biochem. Phys</source>.
<volume>39</volume><issue>(1)</issue>:
<fpage>84</fpage>&#8211;
<lpage>91</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
    <label><p><bold>Author Affiliations</bold></p></label>
<fn id="n1"><p>First and last authors: Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793; Second, third, and last authors: Horticulture Department, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793. Fourth author: Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 27695. Fifth and sixth authors: USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Crop Genetics and Breeding Research Unit, Tifton, GA, 31793. Sixth author: USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS, 39762.</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="cor1">
    <label>*</label>Corresponding author Email: <email>pozias@uga.edu</email>
</corresp>
</fn-group>
<sec>
<title>Supplementary data</title>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://meridian.allenpress.com/peanut-science/article-supplement/447912/xlsx/pnut-47-03-03_s01">pnut-47-03-03_s01.xlsx</ext-link></p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://meridian.allenpress.com/peanut-science/article-supplement/447912/xlsx/pnut-47-03-03_s02">pnut-47-03-03_s02.xlsx</ext-link></p>
</sec>
</back>
</article>
