The 3595 bp region upstream of the start codon in Ara h 2.02 was analyzed for different motifs, particularly those known to confer seed specificity, using PLACE (Higo et al., 1999) and PLANTCARE (Lescot et al., 2002) databases and search tools.

The Ara h 2.02pro∶Gfp∶Gus fusion was constructed from pCambia1304 where the CaMV 35S promoter driving the Gfp∶Gus cassette had been excised by digestion with NcoI and HindIII. The promoter region of Ara h 2.02 was amplified from the plasmid clone 8A2a (GI 148613180, EF 609644) using specific primer combinations, 697 sense / 698 anti-sense (989 bp), 703 sense / 698 anti-sense (1927 bp), or 1013 sense / 698 anti-sense (2517 bp) that included appropriate restriction sites (Table 1). PCR amplification was carried out according to the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 94 C for 30 s, variable annealing temperatures and extension times at 72 C (primers 697 / 698: 48 C for 30 sec, 1-min extension; 703/698: 50 C for 30 sec, 2-min extension; 1013/698: 50 C for 30 sec and 3.5-min extension) with a final extension of 7 min at 72 C and a 4 C hold. The PCR products were digested with NcoI and HindIII and gel purified using a Qiagen kit as per the manufacturer's protocol (Qiagen). After ligation of the digested vector and PCR products, the plasmids were transformed into E. coli DH5α (NEB) competent cells, extracted using the Qiagen Miniprep Kit (Qiagen), and inserts were sequenced. Plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV 3101 by electroporation.

Somatic embryos (SE) were obtained by initiating cultures from mature peanut seeds of ‘Georgia Green’ in the SE induction medium which consisted of FN lite macro salts (Samoylov et al., 1998), MS micronutrients (Murashige and Skoog, 1962), B5 vitamins (Gamborg et al., 1968), 1 g/L L-asparagine (Fisher Scientific), 3 mg/L picloram (Dow Agrosciences), 30 g/L sucrose (J. T. Baker, Inc.), and 8 g/L agar (Sigma). The pH was adjusted to 5.7–5.8 prior to autoclaving at 121 C for 20 min. The medium was cooled below 65 C and then filter sterilized L-glutamine solution, 1 g/L (Acros Organics), was added as a supplement prior to dispensing to plates. Seeds were surface sterilized in 50% solution of commercial bleach (Clorox) for 15 min on a shaker, followed by three rinses with sterile deionized water. The plumule region of the embryo axis was carefully excised under a stereomicroscope. Embryogenic cultures were grown in the dark at 26 ± 2 C for up to 9 mo with periodic subculture every 4 wk. Bombardment was conducted 12–14 d after subculture.

The Qiagen Plasmid Maxi/Midi Kit was used to extract plasmid DNA from an overnight culture of E. coli cells. DNA quantification was carried out with the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen). Microprojectile bombardment and selection were conducted as described previously (Chu et al., 2008). Hygromycin-resistant embryogenic tissues were regenerated on MS medium supplemented with 1 mg/L thidiazuron (NOR-AM Chemical Co.) along with 20 mg/L hygromycin (Sigma), 30 g/L sucrose, and 8 g/L agar under a daily photoperiod of 16 h light (50 µmol/m²/s) followed by 8 h of darkness for at least 7–8 wk. Somatic embryos undergoing conversion were transferred to fresh MS medium containing 20 mg/L hygromycin. Embryos displaying well-developed shoot-root axes were subsequently transferred to ventilated vessels containing MS medium with 0.5 mg/L kinetin (Sigma) and 0.25 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine (Sigma). Well-developed shoots were selected for rooting in Magenta vessels on MS medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/L 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (Sigma). Plants with well-developed roots were transferred to soil, acclimatized, and grown in the greenhouse.

Arabidopsis transformation was carried out by the standard floral dip procedure (Clough and Bent, 1998). Seeds (T₁) from treated inflorescences and subsequent generations (T₂–T₃) were sterilized in 70% alcohol for 30 sec, 50% Clorox/0.02% Triton X-100 for 6 min, and washed three times with sterile deionized water. The putative transgenic seeds were selected in ½-strength MS medium containing hygromycin (50 mg/L final concentration) and 8 g/L agar. Seeds were plated and stratified at 4 C for 4–7 d before being transferred to a growth chamber at 22 ± 2 C under a 16 h light: 8 h dark photoperiod. Hygromycin-resistant seedlings were transferred to soil and analyzed after 2 wk by PCR and GUS histochemistry to confirm positive transformants. From each T₂ line showing 3∶1 Mendelian segregation for hygromycin resistance, at least 8 transgenic plants were chosen for bulk harvest and T₃ seeds were screened for hygromycin resistance. Plates showing 100% survival and growth were considered to contain homozygous lines.

Genomic DNA was extracted as described previously (Singsit et al., 1997). Putative transgenic Arabidopsis plants were screened by amplifying the 989 bp, 1927 bp, or 2517 bp promoter region by the same set of primers used initially for cloning (Table 1). The Gus gene was detected by using primers 1621 sense/1622 antisense, which generated a product of 1061 bp. Actin depolymerizing factor, a housekeeping gene, was detected by primers 400 sense / 401 antisense producing a 450 bp product, and Ara h 2 by primers 91 sense / 189 antisense, for a PCR product size of 337 bp. Putative transgenic peanut plants were screened by using the 1 kb promoter forward primer 697 and Gfp reverse primer 969, product size of 1270 bp. PCR amplification was carried out according to the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 94 C for 30 s, variable annealing temperatures and extension times (annealing temperatures: 697 / 969, 59.3 C; 400 / 401, 53 C; 91 / 189, 54 C; 1621 / 1622, 71 C for 60 s; extension times: 697 / 969, 120 s; 400 / 401, 60 s; 91 / 189, 60 s; 1621 / 1622, 75 s at 72 C) with a final extension of 7 min at 72 C and a 4 C hold. PCR products (8 µl) were separated in 1% (w/v) agarose gels (70V for 1 h) containing ethidium bromide (0.1 µg/ml) with a 1 kb Hi-Low ladder (Minnesota Molecular) as marker. Gels were visualized using a UV transilluminator.

Genomic DNA was extracted with the Qiagen Plant DNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer's protocol and quantified by a Nanodrop1000 (Nanodrop). Approximately 20 µg DNA was digested overnight at 37°C with 50 units of Hind III restriction enzyme in a 20 µl final reaction volume. Digested DNA fragments were separated overnight by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel in 1× TBE buffer at 25V. DNA was blotted onto Genescreen Plus nylon membrane (NEN Life Sciences) by capillary transfer. The membrane was pre-hybridized in 30 ml hybridization buffer (6×SSC, 1% SDS, 100 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA) at 65 C overnight. Probes were labeled with α-³²P-dCTP following the protocol described in the PCR labeling kit (Sigma) and cleaned with Sephadex® G-50 (Amersham). Labeled probe was denatured at 95 C for 10 min and placed immediately on ice before adding into the hybridization buffer. Hybridization was conducted at 65 C overnight followed by four washes at the same temperature for 15 min each with the following buffers: 1) 2×SSC, 0.1% SDS; 2) 1× SSC, 0.1% SDS; 3) 0.5× SSC, 0.1% SDS; and 4) 0.1 ×SSC, 0.1% SDS. Signal was detected with the Storm Phosphorimager system (Amersham Biosciences).

RNA was extracted from 100 mg leaf samples / seed cotyledons (stage 3) (Paik-Ro et al., 2002) of transformed and non-transformed control plants using an RNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). Two rounds of DNase treatment were employed, one at the column purification stage (Qiagen) and another post purification (DNase from Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers' protocols. RT-PCR employed a One Step RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Subsequent conditions were as above for PCR analysis. A set of negative RT controls was also included to test for genomic DNA contamination. Actin depolymerizing factor (Adf) served as a control housekeeping gene and was amplified for 24 cycles. Gus was amplified for 30 cycles and Ara h 2 for 28 cycles for semi-quantitative RT-PCR purposes. Image quantification (ImageQuant TL, Amersham Biosciences) was used to estimate amounts of RT-PCR products by densitometry.

Four seeds were selected from the T₁ peanut lines and each seed was divided into two cotyledons, one containing the embryo axis. The half containing the embryo axis was transferred to soil. The other half was further divided into two pieces, one of which was used for GUS assay and the other for GFP analysis. Leaf tissues (2 and 8 wk post planting) were tested for GUS activity. Tissues were immersed in a GUS reagent solution (Jefferson et al., 1987) and incubated overnight at 37 C in the dark with appropriate controls, i.e. non-transformed or 35S transformed plants. An indigo blue color confirmed GUS expression.

GUS quantification was carried out by grinding 100 mg of sample (seeds/leaf tissues) in 200 µl of extraction buffer (100 µl 0.1 M NaH₂PO₄, pH 7, 0.014 µl ß-mercaptoethanol, 0.4 µl 0.5 M Na₂EDTA, 0.2 mg Sarkosyl, 0.2 µl Triton X-100 and 99.38 µl of dH₂O). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 C. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and protein was estimated by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Homogenate (20 µl) containing 5 µg protein was mixed with 80 µl of GUS assay buffer prepared by adding 0.88 mg MUG (4-methylumbelliferyl ß-D-glucuronide; Sigma) in each ml of extraction buffer. A 1 mM MU (sodium methylumbelliferone; Sigma) stock solution was used to prepare dilutions for generation of a standard curve. After 30 min, 475 µl of 200 mM Na₂CO₃, pH 11.2, stop-buffer was added to 25 µl of each reaction mixture or standard dilution. Duplicate samples of 200 µl for each of three plants per line were loaded in a microtiter plate and fluorescence was determined at excitation and emission wavelengths of 365 nm and 444 nm, respectively. To determine endogenous background GUS activity, plant extract from non-transgenic plants was taken as a control. GUS activity was calculated as pmoles MU/mg protein/min.

GFP was detected by placing the plant material (seeds or leaf tissues, as appropriate) directly under blue light and observing with a SV11 epifluorescence stereomicroscope (Zeiss) equipped with a 100W mercury lamp as the light source with a 480 ± 30 nm excitation filter and a 515 nm long-pass emission filter (Chroma Technology). Images were captured with an Axiocam digital camera (Zeiss).

Data were subjected to Student's t-test using standard MINITAB version 15, statistical software (Minitab, Inc.).

A detailed analysis for short conserved putative cis-regulatory sequences was undertaken for 3595 bp upstream of the translational start site for Ara h 2.02 using PLACE and PLANTCARE databases and search tools with the sequence information of EF 609644, GI148613180. The analysis revealed cis-regulatory elements known to confer seed-specific expression and response to growth regulators (Table 2). Since numerous cis-regulatory elements responsible for seed-specific expression were present in the 1 kb promoter region (Table 2), both peanut and Arabidopsis transformation were conducted with this promoter-reporter construct.

Two fertile transgenic lines, designated BP 1.4 and BP 1.8, were obtained via hygromycin selection of peanut embryogenic cultures bombarded with a plasmid carrying the Ara h 2.02pro∶Gfp∶Gus fusion. Southern blot hybridization results showed that both the lines were homozygous in the T₃ generation although BP 1.4 showed one band and BP 1.8 showed four bands hybridizing with the Gus gene (Fig. 1). Transgene integration at a single locus seems likely given the similar hybridization pattern among all T₃ progeny from each parental line.

GUS and GFP expression was restricted to the cotyledons of seeds and essentially absent from vegetative tissues (Fig. 2). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR results showed that Ara h 2 gene expression in transgenic stage 3 peanut seeds was similar to the control (Fig. 2B), particularly when expressed as a fraction of Adf (Adf : Ara h 2 ratio of 1.32 in transgenic vs. 1.44 in control). Between the two transgenic lines BP 1.4 and BP 1.8, Gus transcripts were not significantly different at P<0.01 (Fig. 2B). Even though BP 1.8 carried a higher copy number of Ara h 2.02pro∶Gfp∶Gus than BP 1.4, GUS expression levels as measured in pmol MU/mg protein/min were not significantly different between the two lines for both tissues tested, although GUS expression was shown to be several orders of magnitude higher in stage 3 seeds compared with 2-wk-old vegetative tissues of transgenic peanut lines (Fig. 2C, D).

Faint GUS expression was observed in vegetative parts of young seedlings 2 wk after germination and GUS expression was undetectable in 8-wk-old leaves. The presence of transcript (Gfp∶Gus cassette) was confirmed by RT-PCR in 2-wk-old tissues from T₂ individuals (Fig. 3A) and also by semi-quantitative RT-PCR in the T₃ generation (Gus transcript only, data not shown). There was no significant difference between the two transgenic lines (BP 1.4 and BP 1.8) in the level of Gus transcripts from 2-wk-old vegetative tissues (data not shown). Quantitative GUS analysis showed that expression in line BP 1.4 was similar to BP 1.8 after a 30-min assay (Fig. 2D). Negative controls consisted of two lines, which were transgene nulls segregating from the transformed lines, i.e., lacking the transgene cassette (confirmed by PCR and Southern blot). Neither GUS enzyme activity nor Gus transcripts was detectable in 8-wk-old plants from either transgenic line at any of the three generations.

Six transgenic Arabidopsis T₁ lines containing the 1 kb Ara h 2.02pro∶Gfp∶Gus cassette, five with the 2 kb promoter, and six with the 2.5 kb promoter were recovered. Five transgenic lines containing the reporter genes controlled by the CaMV 35S promoter also were obtained. Single locus lines for each construct were identified, namely line numbers 58 (1 kb); 67, 68 (2 kb) and 37, 38 (CaMV 35S). Transgenic lines containing the 2.5 kb promoter showed poor seed set. Similar constitutive GUS expression patterns from all three Ara h 2.02 promoter regions, and the CaMV 35S promoter, were observed in transgenic Arabidopsis plants compared to no expression in the non-transformed controls (Fig. 3).